GPT-5.2 (xhigh) vs. Magistral Medium 1.2

Comparison between GPT-5.2 (xhigh) and Magistral Medium 1.2 across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.

For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.

OpenAIOpenAI
MistralMistral
Intelligence
Intelligence Index
30*
12*
GDPval-AA v2
362
Humanity's Last Exam
38%
10%
CritPt
12%
0%
AA-Omniscience
−1
−27
AA-LCR v1.1
83%
53%
Cost
Price per 1M Tokens
$1.8725
Input Price per 1M Tokens
$1.75
Output Price per 1M Tokens
$14.00
Cache Hit Price per 1M Tokens
$0.175
Token Use
Performance
Output Speed
68 tokens/s
Time to First Token
137.88s
Time to First Answer Token
137.88s
End-to-End Response Time
145.19s
Technical specifications
Context Window
400k tokens~600 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font
128k tokens~192 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font
Release Date
December 2025
September 2025
Knowledge Cutoff
August 2025
Reasoning
Yes
Yes
Input modality

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Output modality

Supports: text

Supports: text

Open Source (Weights)
No
No

* Estimated

Highlights

Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
No data available

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench v4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench v4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
See more

Agentic knowledge work, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic SaaS workflows

Agentic coding & terminal use

Coding

Reasoning & knowledge

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

Physics reasoning

Long context reasoning

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

Agentic business operations

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

Instruction following

Agentic tool use

Long-horizon agentic tasks

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

Visual reasoning

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Intelligence Index Comparisons

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)

Context Window

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

Speed

Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better

Latency

Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better

Frequently Asked Questions