This model is deprecated. We only continue performance benchmarking for the default 10k input token workload. Results for other workloads are historical and no longer updated.
Anthropic has launched a newer model, Claude Opus 5 (low). We suggest considering it instead.
For more information, see comparison of Claude Opus 5 (low) to other models and API provider benchmarks for Claude Opus 5 (low).
Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) API Provider Benchmarking & Analysis
This analysis is intended to support you in choosing the best API provider of Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) for your use-case.
Fastest
Amazon
AnthropicOutput speed
Total 2 providers
Lowest Latency
AnthropicAmazonTime to first token
Total 2 providers
Lowest Price
AnthropicAmazonBlended price (per 1M tokens)
Total 2 providers
Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, high) is available through 2 API providers, each offering different performance characteristics and pricing. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across providers.
- For output speed, the top providers are Amazon (56.4 t/s) and Anthropic (44.1 t/s).
- For latency, Anthropic (1.53s) and Amazon (1.58s) offer the lowest time to first token.
- For pricing, Anthropic (3.85) and Amazon (3.85) offer the lowest blended prices per 1M tokens.
- Anthropic offers both the lowest latency and best pricing, making it attractive for cost-conscious applications. Amazon is the fastest option for throughput-intensive workloads.
Highlights
Pricing
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Pricing: Blended Price
Pricing: Cache Discount
Output Speed vs. Price
Speed
Measured by Output Speed (tokens per second)
Output Speed: Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)
Latency vs. Output Speed
Latency
Measured by Time (seconds) to First Token
Time to First Token
End-to-End Response Time
Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed
End-to-End Response Time
Key Comparison Metrics & API Features
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) providers
Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) is currently available through 2 API providers that we benchmark and track.
All 2 providers of Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) support function calling (tool use).
When choosing a provider for Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort), consider: output speed (for throughput-intensive tasks), latency (for interactive applications requiring quick first responses), pricing (for cost-sensitive workloads), and API features like JSON mode or function calling.
Yes, provider performance can vary over time due to infrastructure changes, load balancing, and updates. We continuously benchmark all providers and display historical performance trends in the "Over Time" charts.
For information about Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)'s intelligence, capabilities, modalities, and how it compares to other models, see the model overview page. View model overview