Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 Benchmark Leaderboard
v1.1의 새로운 점
v1.1은 v1.0을 대체하며, 버전 간 점수는 비교할 수 없습니다. Harvey가 법률 전문가와 진행한 연구에서 환각은 변호사가 어떤 결과물을 선호하는지를 좌우하는 주요 요인으로 나타났습니다. 이에 Harvey와 협력해 채점에 환각 검사를 추가했습니다.
- 작업과 기준을 개선한 Harvey의 최신 비공개 데이터 세트
- 모든 결과물을 작업의 원본 문서와 대조하는 새로운 환각 검사로, 중대한 환각은 채점에서 감점
- 채점자를 GPT-6 Sol, Grok 4.7, Claude Opus 5.5로 업데이트했습니다. 자기 선호는 미미했으며, 편향을 줄이기 위해 세 결과를 평균합니다
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1
점수
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: 환각 게이트 적용 후 전체 통과율
환각
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: 작업당 환각 수
환각 게이트 적용 후 근접 통과율
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: 환각 게이트 적용 후 근접 통과율
점수 비교
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: 환각 게이트 적용 후 전체 통과율 대 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
비용
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: 작업당 비용
토큰 사용량
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: 작업당 출력 토큰
속도
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: 작업당 시간
턴 수
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: 과제당 평균 턴 수
분야별 점수
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: 분야별 환각 게이트 적용 후 전체 통과율 (정규화)
모델 크기(오픈 웨이트 모델만)
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: 환각 게이트 적용 후 전체 통과율 대 총 파라미터 수
점수 vs. 출시일
Harvey LAB-AA v1.1: 환각 게이트 적용 후 전체 통과율 대 출시일
과제 및 제출물 예시
공개 작업 세트에서 대표적인 Harvey LAB 작업과 각 모델에 제공된 참조 파일, 생성된 제출물을 살펴보세요.
지시 사항
Review the attached acquisition data room contracts and internal memo for change of control and assignment provisions, and prepare a comprehensive deal team report.
Output: coc-analysis-report.docx
제출물
모델이 생성해야 하는 예상 결과물
- coc-analysis-report.docxA comprehensive deal team report analyzing change of control and assignment provisions across the target’s material contracts.
모델 제출물
각 모델이 생성한 결과물
순위표
개발사 | 이름 | Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate | Criterion Pass Rate | 작업당 중대한 환각 수 | 작업당 비용 | 출시일 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muse Wonder Full (Max) | 13.1% | 95.5% | 0.62 | - | 2026년 10월 | |
| 2 | Muse Wonder (Max) | 10.0% | 95.1% | 0.89 | $13.86 | 2026년 10월 | |
| 3 | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | 9.4% | 92.8% | 0.74 | $9.49 | 2026년 9월 | |
| 4 | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | 8.9% | 96.0% | 1.68 | $4.21 | 2026년 9월 | |
| 5 | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | 8.6% | 90.6% | 0.03 | $13.67 | 2026년 9월 | |
| 6 | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) | 6.9% | 90.6% | 0.09 | $2.48 | 2026년 9월 | |
| 7 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) | 6.4% | 92.4% | 1.32 | $21.73 | 2026년 9월 | |
| 8 | Kimi K3 (Max) | 5.3% | 93.0% | 2.09 | $6.19 | 2026년 7월 | |
| 9 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | 4.2% | 90.0% | 0.59 | $17.93 | 2026년 9월 | |
| 10 | GPT-6 Sol (Max) | 3.6% | 86.9% | 0.07 | $3.33 | 2026년 9월 | |
| 11 | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | 3.3% | 86.0% | 0.38 | $0.22 | 2026년 9월 | |
| 12 | Mistral Large 4 Preview | 3.1% | 93.0% | 2.11 | $2.54 | 2026년 10월 | |
| 13 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | 2.8% | 92.1% | 1.03 | $14.03 | 2026년 9월 | |
| 14 | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | 2.8% | 88.0% | 1.61 | $0.43 | 2026년 10월 | |
| 15 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | 1.7% | 92.5% | 2.58 | $0.59 | 2026년 9월 |
평가 살펴보기
A composite benchmark aggregating ten challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across mathematics, science, coding, and reasoning.
A composite measure providing an industry standard to communicate model openness for users and developers.
A private evaluation developed by Artificial Analysis for frontier agentic capability in long-horizon knowledge work, testing agents on realistic business workflows that require deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and memos.
GDPval-AA v2.1 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop via Stirrup to solve tasks, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.
A benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis for how well AI models build interactive 3D experiences. Models work as agents in an offline sandbox via Stirrup to turn a written brief into a three.js scene, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise votes.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of the APEX-Agents benchmark, testing AI agents on long-horizon, cross-application tasks in professional-services environments with realistic application tooling.
Artificial Analysis' data analysis benchmark, testing AI agents on their ability to work with spreadsheets and documents to answer quantitative questions a Business Analyst or Data Analyst would face day-to-day.
A benchmark measuring agentic task completion across simulated SaaS application environments, scoring the share of each task's objectives completed without guardrail violations.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), testing AI agents on real-world legal work from Harvey's dataset of 120 private tasks spanning 24 legal practice areas. v1.1, built in collaboration with Harvey, checks every deliverable against the task's source documents for hallucinations, so work that passes every rubric criterion but contains a material hallucination receives no credit. A panel of three judges grades each deliverable criterion-by-criterion.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Surge AI's GDP.pdf benchmark, testing whether language models can reason over long, real-world professional documents and satisfy detailed task-specific criteria.
Artificial Analysis' independent implementation of ServiceNow's EnterpriseOps-Gym, an agentic benchmark testing whether LLM agents can complete stateful, multi-step enterprise workflows across eight business domains via live tool use, graded on the final state of the underlying databases.
A harder 66-task benchmark of complex terminal work across software, machine learning, science, operations, security, hardware, and media, with recalibrated compute and time allowances and improved instructions, environments, and verifiers.
A 70-task benchmark of research workflows authored and reviewed by domain experts across the life, physical, earth, mathematical, and engineering sciences, each completed in a terminal and checked by its own set of tests.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Cognition's FrontierCode 1.1, a private agentic coding benchmark that tests models on completing coding tasks in a way that would actually get merged by maintainers of real-world repositories.
A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).
A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.
A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 288 test set subproblems from 80 laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.
A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.
A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.
The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of IBM's ITBench benchmark, testing AI agents on Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis from offline incident snapshots. The agent inspects alerts, events, traces, and topology and identifies the contributing-factor entities (deployments, pods, namespaces, network policies, etc.) responsible for the failure.
An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.
A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.
An open benchmark from Wisedocs measuring how well models reason over long, fragmented medical records, performing the multi-document synthesis claims professionals rely on when reviewing insurance and healthcare cases.
A fintech customer-support benchmark from the 𝜏-Knowledge framework that tests whether agents can navigate a large unstructured knowledge base and execute multi-step tool calls to resolve realistic banking workflows.
A verified refresh of Terminal-Bench 2.0 — 89 curated tasks across software engineering, system administration, data processing, model training, and security, with environment and instruction fixes so scores reflect agent capability rather than environment gaps.
An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.
A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.
An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.
A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.
A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.
A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.