Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning Benchmark Leaderboard
AA-LCR v1.1
점수
AA-LCR v1.1: 점수
AA-LCR v1.1: 점수 vs. 작업당 비용
토큰 사용량
AA-LCR v1.1: 작업당 출력 토큰
비용
AA-LCR v1.1: 작업당 비용
속도
AA-LCR v1.1: 작업당 시간
점수 vs. 출시일
AA-LCR v1.1: 점수 vs. 출시일
예시 작업
자주 묻는 질문
Artificial Analysis Long Context Reasoning은 AI 모델이 장문 문서에서 정보를 추출하고 연결하여 추론할 수 있는지 측정합니다. 다양한 분야와 형식의 문서를 사용하는 100개 문항으로 구성됩니다.
AA-LCR은 개방형 답변 문항을 통과 또는 실패로 채점합니다. 다른 LLM이 모델의 답변을 공식 답변과 동등하다고 판단하면 점수를 받습니다. 최종 AA-LCR 점수는 벤치마크 전체에서 모델의 평균 통과율입니다.
AA-LCR 결과가 공개된 모델 중 Kimi K3 (Max)의 점수가 88.7%로 가장 높습니다. 모델 보기
AA-LCR에는 기업 보고서, 업계 보고서, 정부 의견 수렴 문서, 학술 논문, 법률 문서, 마케팅 자료, 설문 보고서 등의 장문 문서 세트가 포함됩니다.
큰 컨텍스트 창이 있다고 해서 모델이 장문 문서를 효과적으로 추론할 수 있는 것은 아닙니다. AA-LCR은 긴 입력에서 정보를 찾고 연결하고 종합할 수 있는지 평가하며, 이는 재무 분석, 법률 검토, 연구, 기업 문서 업무에 중요합니다.
평가 살펴보기
A composite benchmark aggregating ten challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across mathematics, science, coding, and reasoning.
A composite measure providing an industry standard to communicate model openness for users and developers.
A private evaluation developed by Artificial Analysis for frontier agentic capability in long-horizon knowledge work, testing agents on realistic business workflows that require deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and memos.
GDPval-AA v2.1 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop via Stirrup to solve tasks, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of the APEX-Agents benchmark, testing AI agents on long-horizon, cross-application tasks in professional-services environments with realistic application tooling.
Artificial Analysis' data analysis benchmark, testing AI agents on their ability to work with spreadsheets and documents to answer quantitative questions a Business Analyst or Data Analyst would face day-to-day.
A benchmark measuring agentic task completion across simulated SaaS application environments, scoring the share of each task's objectives completed without guardrail violations.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), testing AI agents on real-world legal work from Harvey's dataset of 120 private tasks spanning 24 legal practice areas. The agent reads case documents in a sandbox and produces legal deliverables (e.g., memos, disclosure schedules, deposition summaries), graded criterion-by-criterion by a single LLM rubric judge.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Surge AI's GDP.pdf benchmark, testing whether language models can reason over long, real-world professional documents and satisfy detailed task-specific criteria.
Artificial Analysis' independent implementation of ServiceNow's EnterpriseOps-Gym, an agentic benchmark testing whether LLM agents can complete stateful, multi-step enterprise workflows across eight business domains via live tool use, graded on the final state of the underlying databases.
A harder 66-task benchmark of complex terminal work across software, machine learning, science, operations, security, hardware, and media, with recalibrated compute and time allowances and improved instructions, environments, and verifiers.
A 70-task benchmark of research workflows authored and reviewed by domain experts across the life, physical, earth, mathematical, and engineering sciences, each completed in a terminal and checked by its own set of tests.
A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).
A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.
A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 288 test set subproblems from 80 laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.
A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.
A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.
The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of IBM's ITBench benchmark, testing AI agents on Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis from offline incident snapshots. The agent inspects alerts, events, traces, and topology and identifies the contributing-factor entities (deployments, pods, namespaces, network policies, etc.) responsible for the failure.
An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.
A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.
An open benchmark from Wisedocs measuring how well models reason over long, fragmented medical records, performing the multi-document synthesis claims professionals rely on when reviewing insurance and healthcare cases.
A fintech customer-support benchmark from the 𝜏-Knowledge framework that tests whether agents can navigate a large unstructured knowledge base and execute multi-step tool calls to resolve realistic banking workflows.
A verified refresh of Terminal-Bench 2.0 — 89 curated tasks across software engineering, system administration, data processing, model training, and security, with environment and instruction fixes so scores reflect agent capability rather than environment gaps.
An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.
A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.
An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.
A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.
A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.
A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.