모든 평가

AA-Briefcase v1.1: Agentic Knowledge Work Benchmark

A private evaluation developed by Artificial Analysis for frontier agentic capability in long-horizon knowledge work, testing agents on realistic business workflows that require deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and memos.

AA-Briefcase는 수천 개의 입력 파일과 총 91개 과제로 구성된 4개의 다주간 지식 업무 프로젝트에서 모델을 평가합니다. 각 시나리오에서 모델은 데이터 과학, 제품 관리, 기업 전략 등의 분야에서 현실적인 전문 업무 흐름을 완수해야 합니다. 각 시나리오는 에이전트가 순서대로 진행하는 다주간 업무 흐름이며, 매주 여러 과제가 포함됩니다. 각 과제의 결과물은 검사 항목 루브릭으로 평가됩니다. 한 시나리오의 과제들은 여러 주에 걸쳐 파일과 맥락을 공유하지만, 현재 모델은 이전 제출물을 이어받지 않고 각 과제를 독립적으로 실행합니다.

AA-Briefcase데이터과학제품관리은행운영중공업전략1주차2주차3주차4주차5주차6주차과제 1과제 2과제 3과제 4평가시나리오AA-Briefcase는 네 가지 주요 지식 업무 영역을 각각 별도의 프로젝트 시나리오로구성합니다주차각 시나리오는 전문 업무 흐름을 재현하도록 설계된 여러 주차로 구성됩니다과제매주 최대 5개의 과제가 있으며 에이전트는 시나리오와 주차 맥락 안에서 이를 완료해야 합니다검사각 과제는 객관적 루브릭 검사, 분석 품질, 프레젠테이션 품질의 세 차원에서 과제별 기준으로채점됩니다루브릭기준별 이진 통과 또는 실패분석 품질다른 모델과 쌍대 비교프레젠테이션다른 모델과 쌍대 비교

각 과제는 세 가지 유형의 검사로 평가됩니다.

루브릭

검사별 이진 통과 또는 실패

모델이 과제 지시를 따르고, 소스 파일에 숨겨진 요구 사항을 파악하고, 올바른 근거를 사용해 적절한 결론에 도달했나요?

분석 품질

쌍대 비교

다른 모델의 제출물과 비교했을 때 어느 결과물이 더 철저하고 분석적으로 엄밀하며 근거가 충분한가요?

프레젠테이션

쌍대 비교

다른 모델의 제출물과 비교했을 때 어느 것이 더 전문적으로 표현되었나요?

시나리오 구조, 제출 및 채점을 보여 주는 다섯 번째 공개 시나리오를 Hugging Face에 공개했습니다. 이는 시연용이며 AA-Briefcase 공식 결과에는 포함되지 않습니다.

결과

AA-Briefcase Elo

AA-Briefcase v1.1 is an agentic knowledge work benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis. AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates rubric pass rate, analytical quality Elo and presentation Elo · Higher is better
No publicly available API

AA-Briefcase Elo vs. 과제당 비용

AA-Briefcase Elo · 과제당 비용(USD)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

비용

AA-Briefcase 과제당 비용

AA-Briefcase 실행 시 과제당 평균 비용(USD). 토큰 사용량과 대표 캐시 적중률을 반영한 모델 가격으로 계산

과제, 제출물 및 채점 예시

Hugging Face에서 제공되는 공개 실사 시나리오의 대표적인 AA-Briefcase 한 주를 살펴보세요. 여기에 표시된 결과물과 채점은 AA-Briefcase가 평가하는 내용을 보여 줍니다. 점수는 대표 모델 집합에 대해 표시됩니다. 이 대표 시나리오의 제출물과 판정은 모델의 AA-Briefcase Elo나 다른 벤치마크 점수에 반영되지 않습니다.
모델
market_overview.pdf
열기
market_overview.tex
열기

점수 비교

AA-Briefcase Elo vs. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

AA-Briefcase Elo · Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Most attractive quadrant

파일 형식별 결과

결과물 파일 형식(Excel, PowerPoint, PDF, Word, 기타)에 따른 AA-Briefcase 성능입니다.

AA-Briefcase 파일 형식별 루브릭 통과율(정규화)

결과물 파일 형식별 루브릭 통과율 · 점수는 테스트한 모든 모델을 대상으로 파일 형식별로 정규화되며, 녹색은 해당 파일 형식의 최고 점수를, 빨간색은 최저 점수를 나타냅니다

토큰 사용량

AA-Briefcase 과제당 출력 토큰

AA-Briefcase 과제당 사용된 평균 추론 및 답변 토큰
No publicly available API

속도

과제당 시간

Wall-clock time (minutes) per task: answer and reasoning generation plus tool execution time · Lower is better

턴 수

과제당 평균 턴 수

Average number of model turns per AA-Briefcase task · Lower is better
No publicly available API

도구 사용량

AA-Briefcase 실행 중 각 에이전트가 호출한 도구: 도구 범주별 호출 수, 턴당 평균 호출 수, 소스 탐색 범위를 보여 줍니다.

AA-Briefcase 도구 호출 내역, 과제당 평균

AA-Briefcase 과제당 평균 도구 호출 수(목적별 분류)
No publicly available API

모델 크기(오픈 웨이트 모델만)

AA-Briefcase Elo vs. 총 파라미터 수

AA-Briefcase Elo · 파라미터 수 기준 크기(십억) · 오픈 웨이트 모델만 해당
Most attractive quadrant

점수 vs. 출시일

AA-Briefcase Elo vs. 출시일

AA-Briefcase Elo · 모델 출시일
Most attractive region

순위표

개발사
이름
Elo
CI
출시일
1
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)1817-11 / +122026년 9월
2
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)1802-11 / +122026년 9월
3
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)1764-11 / +112026년 9월
4
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)1751-13 / +142026년 9월
5
Meta logoMeta
Muse Wonder Full (Max)1729-10 / +102026년 10월
6
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)1686-10 / +112026년 9월
7
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)1672-9 / +102026년 9월
8
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Opus 5 (Max)1659-8 / +92026년 7월
9
Meta logoMeta
Muse Wonder (Max)1659-10 / +102026년 10월
10
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback)1655-8 / +92026년 9월
11
SpaceXAI logoSpaceXAI
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)1641-9 / +102026년 9월
12
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback)1636-9 / +112026년 9월
13
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh)1634-7 / +92026년 7월
14
SpaceXAI logoSpaceXAI
Grok 4.7 (High)1631-9 / +92026년 9월
15
Anthropic logoAnthropic
Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback)1625-10 / +112026년 9월

평가 살펴보기

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2

A composite benchmark aggregating ten challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across mathematics, science, coding, and reasoning.

AA-Briefcase v1.1: Agentic Knowledge Work BenchmarkAA-Briefcase v1.1: Agentic Knowledge Work Benchmark

A private evaluation developed by Artificial Analysis for frontier agentic capability in long-horizon knowledge work, testing agents on realistic business workflows that require deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and memos.

GDPval-AA v2.1 BenchmarkGDPval-AA v2.1 Benchmark

GDPval-AA v2.1 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop via Stirrup to solve tasks, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.

AA-3D: Interactive 3D Experience BenchmarkAA-3D: Interactive 3D Experience Benchmark

A benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis for how well AI models build interactive 3D experiences. Models work as agents in an offline sandbox via Stirrup to turn a written brief into a three.js scene, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise votes.

APEX-Agents-AA BenchmarkAPEX-Agents-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of the APEX-Agents benchmark, testing AI agents on long-horizon, cross-application tasks in professional-services environments with realistic application tooling.

AA-AnalystAgent BenchmarkAA-AnalystAgent Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' data analysis benchmark, testing AI agents on their ability to work with spreadsheets and documents to answer quantitative questions a Business Analyst or Data Analyst would face day-to-day.

AutomationBench-AA: Agentic SaaS Workflow BenchmarkAutomationBench-AA: Agentic SaaS Workflow Benchmark

A benchmark measuring agentic task completion across simulated SaaS application environments, scoring the share of each task's objectives completed without guardrail violations.

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 BenchmarkHarvey LAB-AA v1.1 Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), testing AI agents on real-world legal work from Harvey's dataset of 120 private tasks spanning 24 legal practice areas. v1.1, built in collaboration with Harvey, checks every deliverable against the task's source documents for hallucinations, so work that passes every rubric criterion but contains a material hallucination receives no credit. A panel of three judges grades each deliverable criterion-by-criterion.

GDP.pdf BenchmarkGDP.pdf Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Surge AI's GDP.pdf benchmark, testing whether language models can reason over long, real-world professional documents and satisfy detailed task-specific criteria.

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA BenchmarkEnterpriseOps-Gym-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' independent implementation of ServiceNow's EnterpriseOps-Gym, an agentic benchmark testing whether LLM agents can complete stateful, multi-step enterprise workflows across eight business domains via live tool use, graded on the final state of the underlying databases.

Terminal-Bench 4.0 BenchmarkTerminal-Bench 4.0 Benchmark

A harder 66-task benchmark of complex terminal work across software, machine learning, science, operations, security, hardware, and media, with recalibrated compute and time allowances and improved instructions, environments, and verifiers.

Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 BenchmarkTerminal-Bench-Science 0.1 Benchmark

A 70-task benchmark of research workflows authored and reviewed by domain experts across the life, physical, earth, mathematical, and engineering sciences, each completed in a terminal and checked by its own set of tests.

FrontierCode 1.1 BenchmarkFrontierCode 1.1 Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Cognition's FrontierCode 1.1, a private agentic coding benchmark that tests models on completing coding tasks in a way that would actually get merged by maintainers of real-world repositories.

AA-PersonalityBench: AI Personality & Communication Style BenchmarkAA-PersonalityBench: AI Personality & Communication Style Benchmark

Measures how models communicate rather than whether they are correct: 30 judged personality traits rolled up into 8 indexes, plus 21 measured communication characteristics.

AA-LCR v1.1: Long Context Reasoning BenchmarkAA-LCR v1.1: Long Context Reasoning Benchmark

A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).

AA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination BenchmarkAA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark

A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.

SciCode BenchmarkSciCode Benchmark

A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 288 test set subproblems from 80 laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.

Humanity's Last Exam BenchmarkHumanity's Last Exam Benchmark

A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.

CritPt BenchmarkCritPt Benchmark

A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.

GPQA Diamond Benchmark

The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.

ITBench-AA BenchmarkITBench-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of IBM's ITBench benchmark, testing AI agents on Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis from offline incident snapshots. The agent inspects alerts, events, traces, and topology and identifies the contributing-factor entities (deployments, pods, namespaces, network policies, etc.) responsible for the failure.

MMMU-Pro BenchmarkMMMU-Pro Benchmark

An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.

IFBench BenchmarkIFBench Benchmark

A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.

MLCR-AA: Medical Long Context Reasoning BenchmarkMLCR-AA: Medical Long Context Reasoning Benchmark

An open benchmark from Wisedocs measuring how well models reason over long, fragmented medical records, performing the multi-document synthesis claims professionals rely on when reviewing insurance and healthcare cases.

HealthBench BenchmarkHealthBench Benchmark

OpenAI's HealthBench: 5,000 health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics, from emergency referrals to global health.

HealthBench Professional BenchmarkHealthBench Professional Benchmark

OpenAI's HealthBench Professional: 525 clinician conversations covering consult, writing and research tasks, graded against physician-written rubrics.

𝜏³-Banking Benchmark𝜏³-Banking Benchmark

A fintech customer-support benchmark from the 𝜏-Knowledge framework that tests whether agents can navigate a large unstructured knowledge base and execute multi-step tool calls to resolve realistic banking workflows.

Terminal-Bench 2.1 BenchmarkTerminal-Bench 2.1 Benchmark

A verified refresh of Terminal-Bench 2.0 — 89 curated tasks across software engineering, system administration, data processing, model training, and security, with environment and instruction fixes so scores reflect agent capability rather than environment gaps.

Terminal-Bench Hard BenchmarkTerminal-Bench Hard Benchmark

An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.

𝜏²-Bench Telecom Benchmark𝜏²-Bench Telecom Benchmark

A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.

MMLU-Pro BenchmarkMMLU-Pro Benchmark

An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.

LiveCodeBench BenchmarkLiveCodeBench Benchmark

A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.

MATH-500 BenchmarkMATH-500 Benchmark

A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.

AIME 2025 BenchmarkAIME 2025 Benchmark

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.

Global-MMLU-Lite BenchmarkGlobal-MMLU-Lite Benchmark

A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.