Gemma 4 31B vs. Claude 4.5 Haiku: comparación de lanzamientos

Comparación de los lanzamientos Gemma 4 31B y Claude 4.5 Haiku: 2 y 2 modelos respectivamente, cada uno con distintas características de inteligencia, rendimiento y precio. A continuación se comparan las métricas clave de los 4 modelos.

  • En inteligencia, Gemma 4 31B obtiene la puntuación más alta: Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning), con 19, frente a Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning), con 17 de Claude 4.5 Haiku.
  • En velocidad de salida, Claude 4.5 Haiku es el más rápido: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning), con 96 tokens/s, frente a Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning), con 35 tokens/s de Gemma 4 31B.

Lanzamientos comparados

Inteligencia

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)

Costo

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better

Velocidad y latencia

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Puntuaciones de capacidades

Índices de capacidades

Mide el rendimiento de los modelos en capacidades e industrias específicas
Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better

Más detalles

Modalidad de entrada
Modalidad de salida
Pesos
Benchmarks de proveedores
Gemma 4 31B (Reasoning)
Logo de GoogleGoogle
19
-
-
-
-
17
21
-
0,0 US$
$0.00
$0.00
-
-
-
-
-
35
1.03s
50.09s
64.22s
-
30.7B
256k
abr 2026
-

Admite: texto, imágenes y video

Admite: texto

CoreWeaveModularGMI
+11
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)
Logo de AnthropicAnthropic
17
15
10
19
16
19
26
$0.21
0,8 US$
$1.00
$5.00
$0.10
524 US$
18k
8k
78M
96
23.10s
23.10s
28.30s
140.34s
-
200k
oct 2025
jul 2025

Admite: texto e imágenes

Admite: texto

No disponible
-
Amazon BedrockGoogleAnthropicMicrosoft Azure
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Non-reasoning)
Logo de AnthropicAnthropic
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0,8 US$
$1.00
$5.00
$0.10
-
-
-
-
88
0.67s
0.67s
6.37s
-
-
200k
oct 2025
jul 2025
No

Admite: texto e imágenes

Admite: texto

No disponible
-
Microsoft AzureAmazon BedrockAnthropicGoogle
Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)
Logo de GoogleGoogle
14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0,2 US$
$0.14
$0.40
$0.14
-
-
-
-
34
2.22s
2.22s
17.05s
-
30.7B
256k
abr 2026
-
No

Admite: texto, imágenes y video

Admite: texto

ModularParasailCerebras
+8