Destacados

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
Nuevo artículo publicado · 24 jul
Claude Opus 5: the new leader in agentic knowledge work
Nuevo artículo publicado · 24 jul
Opus 5: Fable 5 level intelligence at a lower cost per task
Nueva evaluación de modelo de lenguaje · 24 jul
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)
Nueva evaluación de modelo de lenguaje · 24 jul
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort)Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort)
Nueva evaluación de modelo de lenguaje · 24 jul
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort)Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort)
Nueva evaluación de modelo de lenguaje · 24 jul
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort)Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort)
Nueva evaluación de modelo de lenguaje · 24 jul
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)
Nueva evaluación de modelo de lenguaje · 23 jul
Agnes 2.5 Pro AlphaAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha
Nuevo artículo publicado · 22 jul
How Thinking Machines Lab’s Inkling performs on agentic knowledge work
Nueva evaluación de modelo de lenguaje · 22 jul
G9v3-3BG9v3-3B
Nuevo artículo publicado · 21 jul
Kimi K3: second only to Fable 5 on AA-Briefcase
Nuevo artículo publicado · 21 jul
Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Halving Time per Task
Nueva evaluación de modelo de lenguaje · 21 jul
Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)Gemini 3.6 Flash (high)
Nueva evaluación de modelo de lenguaje · 21 jul
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Nueva evaluación de modelo de lenguaje · 20 jul
Motif 3 (Beta)Motif 3 (Beta)
Nuevo artículo publicado · 17 jul
Four frontier launches in eight days: six labs now field a model above 50 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Nuevo artículo publicado · 17 jul
Kimi K3 achieves #3 in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, comparable to Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5
Nueva evaluación de modelo de lenguaje · 16 jul
Kimi K3Kimi K3
Nuevo artículo publicado · 15 jul
Thinking Machines has released Inkling, the new leading U.S. open weights model
Nueva evaluación de modelo de lenguaje · 15 jul
Inkling (xhigh)Inkling (xhigh)Ver más

Inteligencia

Inteligencia de los principales modelos de IA según nuestras evaluaciones independientes

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if the weights are available but commercial use is limited (typically requires obtaining a paid license).

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Inteligencia de modelos de lenguaje de frontera a lo largo del tiempo

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Rendimiento, costo y tiempo de ejecución de los principales agentes de programación en tareas integrales de ingeniería de software

Explorar el índice de agentes de programación de Artificial Analysis

Índice de agentes de programación de Artificial Analysis

Composite average pass@1 across DeepSWE, Terminal-Bench v2, and SWE-Atlas-QnA · Higher is better

Rankings de imagen y video

Mejores modelos de nuestros rankings Image Arena y Video Arena, con intervalos de confianza del 95%

Ranking de texto a imagen

Puntuaciones Elo a partir de votos ciegos de preferencia en nuestro Image Arena. Ver el ranking completo aquí.

Rankings de voz

Mejores modelos de nuestras evaluaciones Text to Speech Arena, Speech to Text y Speech to Speech

Text to Speech Arena Leaderboard

Elo scores from blind preference votes in our Text to Speech Arena · See the full leaderboard here.

Relative Elo score of the models as determined by responses from users in Artificial Analysis' Speech Arena. Some models may not be shown due to not yet having enough votes.

Miden el rendimiento de modelos en capacidades e industrias específicas

Artificial Analysis Agentic Index

Measures performance in agentic workflows, focusing on behaviors like tool use, planning, autonomy, and complex problem solving.
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic tool use

Agentic coding & terminal use

Coding

Reasoning & knowledge

Scientific reasoning

Physics reasoning

Long context reasoning

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

Agentic SaaS workflows

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

Agentic business operations

Instruction following

Long-horizon agentic tasks

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

Visual reasoning

Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

AA-Briefcase es una evaluación agéntica de vanguardia para trabajo cognitivo de largo plazo, que prueba agentes en flujos de trabajo empresariales realistas que requieren entregables como hojas de cálculo, presentaciones y memorandos

AA-Briefcase Elo

AA-Briefcase is an agentic knowledge work benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis. AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates rubric pass rate, analytical quality Elo and presentation Elo · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates analytical quality Elo, presentation Elo, and rubric pass rate, with rubric performance converted into Elo via synthetic head-to-head matches. Elo and 95% confidence interval bounds are clamped at 0.

AA-Omniscience es un benchmark de conocimiento y alucinaciones que premia la precisión, penaliza las respuestas incorrectas y ofrece una vista completa de qué modelos producen resultados fiables en distintos dominios

Índice AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

GDPval-AA v2 evalúa modelos de IA en tareas reales de valor económico en una amplia gama de ocupaciones

GDPval-AA v2 Leaderboard

Elo rating for performance on real-world work tasks · Anchored to a human baseline of 1,000 · Higher is better
Human Baseline (1,000)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

El índice de apertura de Artificial Analysis evalúa qué tan 'abiertos' son los modelos según su disponibilidad y transparencia en distintos componentes.

Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Components

Openness Index underlying score contribution by components, up to a maximum of 18 (higher is more open)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Openness Index vs. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Tokens de salida

Tokens de salida de los principales modelos de IA según nuestras evaluaciones independientes

Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The number of tokens required per Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by multiplying the output tokens per eval by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index, then dividing by task count (excluding repeats).

Precio y costo

Precios y costos reales de los principales modelos de IA según nuestras evaluaciones independientes

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

Price per token included in the request/message sent to the API, represented as USD per million Tokens.

The blended cache price shown here uses cache hit price only. Other caching costs differ by provider:

  • Anthropic: charges a separate cache write fee, with different rates for 5-minute and 1-hour TTLs (1-hour TTL is more expensive).
  • Google (Vertex/Gemini): charges a per-hour cache storage fee in addition to cache hit pricing. Some providers also use tiered pricing for prompts above 200K tokens.
  • OpenAI, DeepSeek, others: typically charge only cache hit pricing with no write or storage fee.

See Prompt Caching for the full breakdown.

Price per token generated by the model (received from the API), represented as USD per million Tokens.

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Velocidad y latencia

Comparación del rendimiento de API de primera parte

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The weighted average time (seconds) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by dividing output tokens per task by output speed, weighted by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index.

Rendimiento de proveedores de API

Output Speed vs. Price: gpt-oss-120b (high)

Output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended) · 10,000 input tokens
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Smaller, emerging providers are offering high output speed and at competitive prices.

Price per token, shown in USD per million tokens. Price is a blend of cache hit, input, and output token prices using the selected ratio (default 7:2:1 cache-input-output).

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent median (P50) measurement over the past 72 hours to reflect sustained changes in performance.

Precios (acierto de caché, entrada y salida): gpt-oss-120b (high)

Price (USD per M Tokens) · Lower is better · 10,000 input tokens

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

Price per token included in the request/message sent to the API, represented as USD per million Tokens.

The blended cache price shown here uses cache hit price only. Other caching costs differ by provider:

  • Anthropic: charges a separate cache write fee, with different rates for 5-minute and 1-hour TTLs (1-hour TTL is more expensive).
  • Google (Vertex/Gemini): charges a per-hour cache storage fee in addition to cache hit pricing. Some providers also use tiered pricing for prompts above 200K tokens.
  • OpenAI, DeepSeek, others: typically charge only cache hit pricing with no write or storage fee.

See Prompt Caching for the full breakdown.

Price per token generated by the model (received from the API), represented as USD per million Tokens.

Output Speed: gpt-oss-120b (high)

Output speed: output tokens per second · 10,000 input tokens

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).