Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) vs. Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort)

Comparação entre Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) e Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) em inteligência, preço, velocidade, janela de contexto e outras métricas.

Para mais detalhes sobre nossa metodologia, consulte a página de metodologia.

AlibabaAlibaba
AnthropicAnthropic
Inteligência
Intelligence Index
34
48
AA-Briefcase
1398
1557
GDPval-AA v2
1463
1629
AutomationBench-AA
48%
54%
Terminal-Bench v4.0
6%
46%
SciCode
47%
55%
Humanity's Last Exam
34%
53%
GDP.pdf
16%
20%
CritPt
5%
28%
AA-Omniscience
−10
34
AA-LCR v1.1
82%
79%
Custo
Preço por 1M de tokens
$0.435
$3.85
Preço de entrada por 1M de tokens
$0.50
$5.00
Preço de saída por 1M de tokens
$3.00
$25.00
Preço de acerto de cache por 1M de tokens
$0.05
$0.50
Custo por tarefa
$0.82
$3.61
Custo para executar o Intelligence Index
US$ 1.170
US$ 4.332
Uso de tokens
Tokens de saída por tarefa
67k
46k
Tokens de raciocínio por tarefa
48k
25k
Tokens de saída para executar o Intelligence Index
198M
81M
Desempenho
Velocidade de saída
47 tokens/s
54 tokens/s
Tempo até o primeiro token
3.81s
17.45s
Tempo até o primeiro token de resposta
46.27s
17.45s
Tempo de resposta de ponta a ponta
56.88s
26.70s
Tempo por tarefa
1075.60s
523.26s
Especificações técnicas
Janela de contexto
256k tokens~384 páginas A4 em fonte Arial tamanho 12
1000k tokens~1.500 páginas A4 em fonte Arial tamanho 12
Data de lançamento
agosto de 2026
julho de 2026
Parâmetros totais
27B
Raciocínio
Sim
Sim
Modalidade de entrada
texto, imagem e vídeo
texto e imagem
Modalidade de saída
texto
texto
Pesos abertos
Sim
Não
Licença
Apache 2.0
A licença permite uso comercial sem restrições
Sim

Destaques

Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

InteligênciaUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench v4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 includes: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench v4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench v4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 includes: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench v4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if commercial use is limited by conditions, and as 'Non-commercial' if the license prohibits commercial use.

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
See more

Agentic knowledge work, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic SaaS workflows

Agentic coding & terminal use

Coding

Reasoning & knowledge

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

Physics reasoning

Long context reasoning

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

Agentic business operations

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

Instruction following

Agentic tool use

Long-horizon agentic tasks

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

Visual reasoning

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 includes: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench v4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

AA-Briefcase

AA-Briefcase Elo

AA-Briefcase is an agentic knowledge work benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis. AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates rubric pass rate, analytical quality Elo and presentation Elo · Higher is better

AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates analytical quality Elo, presentation Elo, and rubric pass rate, with rubric performance converted into Elo via synthetic head-to-head matches. Elo and 95% confidence interval bounds are clamped at 0.

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Openness Index

Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score

Openness Index assesses model openness on a 0 to 100 normalized scale (higher is more open)

Comparações do Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3 includes: AA-Briefcase, GDPval-AA v2, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench v4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Uso de tokens

Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

The number of tokens required per Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by multiplying the output tokens per eval by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index, then dividing by task count (excluding repeats).

Custo

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

Janela de contexto

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Velocidade

Medida pela velocidade de saída (tokens por segundo)

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better

The weighted average time (seconds) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by dividing output tokens per task by output speed, weighted by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index.

Latência

Medida pelo tempo (segundos) até o primeiro token

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time

Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.

Tempo de resposta de ponta a ponta

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better

Seconds to receive a 500 token response. Key components:

  • Input time: Time to receive the first response token
  • Thinking time (only for reasoning models): Time reasoning models spend outputting tokens to reason prior to providing an answer. Amount of tokens based on the average reasoning tokens across a diverse set of 60 prompts (methodology details).
  • Answer time: Time to generate 500 output tokens, based on output speed

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Tamanho do modelo (somente modelos de pesos abertos)

Model Size: Total and Active Parameters

Comparison between total model parameters and parameters active during inference

The total number of trainable weights and biases in the model, expressed in billions. These parameters are learned during training and determine the model's ability to process and generate responses.

The number of parameters actually executed during each inference forward pass, expressed in billions. For Mixture of Experts (MoE) models, a routing mechanism selects a subset of experts per token, resulting in fewer active than total parameters. Dense models use all parameters, so active equals total.

Perguntas frequentes

Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) é mais inteligente. Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) alcança 48, em comparação com Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh), que alcança 34 no Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.

Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) é mais rápido. Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) gera 54.1 tokens por segundo, em comparação com Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh), que gera 47.1 tokens por segundo.

Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) é mais barato. Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) custa $0.43 por 1M de tokens, em comparação com Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort), que custa $3.85 por 1M de tokens (proporção de 7:2:1 entre tokens de acerto do cache, entrada e saída).

Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) tem a menor latência. O tempo até o primeiro token do Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh) é de 3.81s, em comparação com 17.45s no Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort).

Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) tem a maior janela de contexto. Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) aceita 1.0M tokens, em comparação com 260k tokens no Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh).