Muse Ember vs Claude Haiku 5.5: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Muse Ember and Claude Haiku 5.5 releases: 2 and 5 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 7 models.
- For intelligence, Muse Ember and Claude Haiku 5.5 tie at 36 (Muse Ember (Max) and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)).
- For cost per task, Claude Haiku 5.5 is cheapest: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) at $0.04, against Muse Ember (Xhigh) at $0.12 for Muse Ember.
| Claude Haiku 5.5 (max) | Muse Ember (max) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (xhigh) | Muse Ember (xhigh) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (high) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (medium) | Claude Haiku 5.5 (low) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 36 | 36 | 35 | 34 | 30 | 25 | 19 |
| Finance & Accounting | 44 | 45 | 41 | 44 | 38 | 35 | 29 |
| Strategy & Ops | 39 | 49 | 39 | 49 | 37 | 33 | 27 |
| Legal | 39 | 38 | 37 | 38 | 35 | 33 | 27 |
| Healthcare & Medical | 37 | -- | 34 | -- | 32 | 31 | 25 |
| Cost per TaskUSD | $0.41 | $0.14 | $0.25 | $0.12 | $0.16 | $0.09 | $0.04 |
| Time per TaskMinutes | 15.8 | -- | 9.7 | -- | 6.5 | 4.1 | 2.1 |
| Time to First Answer Tokens | 183.84 | -- | 51.52 | -- | 20.55 | 9.84 | 6.86 |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M |
| Creator | |||||||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Input Modality | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image |
| Output Modality | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text |
| Providers | |||||||
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Capability Scores
Capability Indexes
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better