GPT-5.6 Luna vs MiMo-V2-Flash: Release Comparison
Comparison of the GPT-5.6 Luna and MiMo-V2-Flash releases: 6 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 8 models.
- For intelligence, GPT-5.6 Luna scores highest: GPT-5.6 Luna (max) at 38, against MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) at 21 for MiMo-V2-Flash.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indices
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Input modality | Output modality | Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.6 Luna (max) |  OpenAI | 38 | - | - | - | - | 36 | 43 | $0.18 | $0.2 | $0.20 | $1.20 | $0.02 | $320 | 41k | 28k | 154M | 117 | 124.21s | 124.21s | 128.50s | 364.90s | - | 1M | Jul 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - |  | |
| GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) | OpenAI | 35 | 38 | 41 | 35 | 33 | 34 | 41 | $0.09 | $0.2 | $0.20 | $1.20 | $0.02 | $179 | 24k | 15k | 85M | 117 | 45.03s | 45.03s | 49.32s | 201.94s | - | 1M | Jul 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - |  | |
| GPT-5.6 Luna (high) | OpenAI | 32 | 35 | 37 | 33 | 30 | 32 | 38 | $0.04 | $0.2 | $0.20 | $1.20 | $0.02 | $108 | 14k | 7k | 50M | 104 | 8.57s | 8.57s | 13.38s | 135.22s | - | 1M | Jul 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | | |
| GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) | OpenAI | 25 | 27 | 29 | 28 | 25 | 27 | 32 | $0.02 | $0.2 | $0.20 | $1.20 | $0.02 | $44 | 4k | 2k | 18M | 114 | 2.36s | 2.36s | 6.74s | 39.50s | - | 1M | Jul 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | | |
| GPT-5.6 Luna (low) | OpenAI | 22 | 24 | 23 | 25 | 21 | 23 | 29 | $0.01 | $0.2 | $0.20 | $1.20 | $0.02 | $27 | 3k | 559 | 10M | 100 | 2.14s | 2.14s | 7.12s | 24.92s | - | 1M | Jul 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | | |
| MiMo-V2-Flash (Reasoning) |  Xiaomi | 21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.1 | $0.10 | $0.30 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 309B 15B active at inference time | 256k | Dec 2025 | - | Yes | Supports: text | Supports: text | | |||
| GPT-5.6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | OpenAI | 17 | 17 | 15 | 18 | - | 19 | 22 | - | $0.2 | $0.20 | $1.20 | $0.02 | - | - | - | - | 109 | 0.85s | 0.85s | 5.44s | - | - | 1M | Jul 2026 | - | No | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | Not available | - | | |
| MiMo-V2-Flash (Non-reasoning) | Xiaomi | 16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 309B 15B active at inference time | 256k | Dec 2025 | - | No | Supports: text | Supports: text | - | |||