Google has launched a newer model, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, we suggest considering this model instead.

For more information, see Comparison of Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite to other models and API provider benchmarks for Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) logo
Google
•

Proprietary model

•

Released September 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis

API Provider Benchmarks

Model summary

IntelligenceUpdated

13
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
3 out of 4 units for Intelligence.

Speed

N/A
Output tokens per second
Unknown out of 4 units for Speed.

Price

Input
$0.10
per 1M tokens
Output
$0.40
per 1M tokens
1 out of 4 units for Price.

Cache Hit Price

$0.01
USD per 1M tokens
1 out of 4 units for Cache Hit Price.

Verbosity

N/A
Output tokens from Intelligence Index
Unknown out of 4 units for Verbosity.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) is above average in intelligence and well priced when comparing to other non-reasoning models of similar price. The model supports text, image, speech, and video input, outputs text, and has a 1M tokens context window.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) scores 13 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above average among comparable models (averaging 11).

Pricing for Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) is $0.10 per 1M input tokens (competitively priced, average: $0.20) and $0.40 per 1M output tokens (competitively priced, average: $0.70).

ReasoningNo

This page shows the non-reasoning version of this model.

A reasoning variant may also exist.

Input modality

Supports: text, image, speech, video

Output modality

Supports: text

Context window1M
~1500 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font

Metrics are compared against models of the same class:

  • Non-reasoning models → compared only with other non-reasoning models
  • Reasoning models → compared across both reasoning and non-reasoning
  • Open weights models → compared only with other open weights models of the same size class:
    • Tiny: ≤4B parameters
    • Small: 4B–40B parameters
    • Medium: 40B–150B parameters
    • Large: >150B parameters
  • Proprietary models → compared across proprietary and open weights models of the same price range, using a blended 3:1 input/output price ratio:
    • <$0.15 per 1M tokens
    • $0.15–$1 per 1M tokens
    • >$1 per 1M tokens

Highlights

Updated

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Cost per Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Estimate (independent evaluation forthcoming)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if the weights are available but commercial use is limited (typically requires obtaining a paid license).

Intelligence Breakdown

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better
GDPval-AA v2

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

𝜏³-Banking

Agentic tool use

Terminal-Bench v2.1

Agentic coding & terminal use

SciCode

Coding

Humanity's Last Exam

Reasoning & knowledge

GPQA Diamond

Scientific reasoning

CritPt

Physics reasoning

AA-Omniscience Accuracy

Knowledge

AA-Omniscience Non-Hallucination Rate

1 - hallucination rate

AA-LCR

Long context reasoning

AA-BriefcaseNew

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

IFBench

Instruction following

APEX-Agents-AA

Long-horizon agentic tasks

ITBench-AA

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

AutomationBench-AANew

Agentic SaaS workflows

MMMU-Pro

Visual reasoning

Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon.

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Intelligence Index Comparisons

Intelligence vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon.

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Price and Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

Price per token included in the request/message sent to the API, represented as USD per million Tokens.

The blended cache price shown here uses cache hit price only. Other caching costs differ by provider:

  • Anthropic: charges a separate cache write fee, with different rates for 5-minute and 1-hour TTLs (1-hour TTL is more expensive).
  • Google (Vertex/Gemini): charges a per-hour cache storage fee in addition to cache hit pricing. Some providers also use tiered pricing for prompts above 200K tokens.
  • OpenAI, DeepSeek, others: typically charge only cache hit pricing with no write or storage fee.

See Prompt Caching for the full breakdown.

Price per token generated by the model (received from the API), represented as USD per million Tokens.

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Context Window

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning)

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) was released on September 25, 2025.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) was created by Google.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) scores 13 (estimated) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, placing it above average among other non-reasoning models in a similar price tier (median: 11).

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens (very competitive, median: $0.20) and $0.40 per 1M output tokens (very competitive, median: $0.70), based on Google's API.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) costs $0.10 per 1M input tokens and $0.40 per 1M output tokens (based on Google's API). For a blended rate (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio), this is $0.07 per 1M tokens. Pricing may vary by provider. Compare provider pricing

No, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) is not a reasoning model. It provides direct responses without extended chain-of-thought reasoning.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) supports text, image, speech, and video input.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) supports text output.

Yes, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) supports image input and can analyze, describe, and answer questions about images.

Yes, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) is multimodal. It can process text, image, speech, and video input and generate text output.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) has a context window of 1.0M tokens. This determines how much text and conversation history the model can process in a single request.

No, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) is proprietary. The model weights are not publicly available.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) is a proprietary model and Google has not disclosed the model size or parameter count.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) achieves a score of 13 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. This composite benchmark evaluates models across reasoning, knowledge, mathematics, and coding.

Yes, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) is available via API through 1 provider. Compare API providers

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Preview (Sep '25) (Non-reasoning) is available through 1 API provider. Compare providers