Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) vs. DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning)
Comparison between Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) and DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
| Intelligence | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | |||
| Price per 1M Tokens | $0.425 | $0.294 | |
| Input Price per 1M Tokens | $0.25 | $0.28 | |
| Output Price per 1M Tokens | $2.00 | $0.42 | |
| Token Use | |||
| Performance | |||
| Output Speed | 123 tok/s | 34 tok/s | |
| Time to First Answer Token | 37.29s | 4.15s | |
| Time to First Token | 3.86s | 4.15s | |
| End-to-End Time (Mean of Single-Request Workloads) | 39.95s | 66.70s | |
| Technical specifications | |||
| Context Window | 262k tokens~393 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 128k tokens~192 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | |
| Release Date | February 2026 | December 2025 | |
| Total parameters | 36B | 685B | |
| Active parameters | 3B | 37B | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Input modality | Supports: text and image | Supports: text | |
| Output modality | Supports: text | Supports: text | |
| Open Source (Weights) | |||
| License | |||
| License Supports Commercial Use Without Restrictions | Yes | Yes | |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Evaluations
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Agentic SaaS workflows
Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal
Agentic software engineering in open-source repositories
Reasoning & knowledge
Professional document reasoning, All-pass
Agentic coding & terminal use
Physics reasoning
Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents
Legal agentic work, Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate
Agentic business operations
Agentic real-world work tasks, Elo
Agentic interactive 3D experiences, Elo
Product and brand videos designed in code, Elo
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Medical long context reasoning
Visual reasoning
Rich, varied, well-crafted language
Well-structured, scannable, answer-first
Truthful, acknowledges uncertainty, non-sycophantic
Use of filler and generic language
Openness Index
Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Performance
Measured by time per task (minutes), output speed (tokens per second), time to first answer token and time to first token (seconds)
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Output Speed
Time to First Answer Token
Model Size (Open Weights Models Only)
Model Size: Total and Active Parameters
Frequently Asked Questions
DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) is cheaper. At a 7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio, DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) costs $0.29 per 1M tokens (based on DeepSeek's API), compared with Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) at $0.42 per 1M tokens (based on Alibaba's API).
DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) has lower latency. DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) has a time to first answer token of 4.15s (based on the median across providers serving the model), compared with Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) at 37.29s (based on Alibaba's API).
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) has a larger context window. Qwen3.5 35B A3B (Reasoning) supports 262k tokens, compared with DeepSeek V3.2 (Non-reasoning) at 128k tokens.