Muse Wonder (High) vs. Muse Wonder (Max)
Comparison between Muse Wonder (High) and Muse Wonder (Max) across intelligence, price, speed, context window and more.
For details relating to our methodology, see our Methodology page.
| Intelligence | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 41 | 44 | |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1 | 1610 | 1659 | |
| AutomationBench-AA | 67% | 68% | |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 38% | 52% | |
| FrontierCode 2.0 | 27% | 28% | |
| AA-Omniscience v1.1 | 25 | 25 | |
| GDP.pdf | 29% | 31% | |
| HLE-Diamond | 35% | 39% | |
| CritPt v2 (Hard Subset) | 51% | 51% | |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 | 22% | 26% | |
| Cost | |||
| Price per 1M Tokens | $2.94 | $2.94 | |
| Input Price per 1M Tokens | $4.00 | $4.00 | |
| Output Price per 1M Tokens | $20.00 | $20.00 | |
| Cache Hit Price per 1M Tokens | $0.20 | $0.20 | |
| Cost per Task | $6.95 | ||
| Cost to Run Intelligence Index | $5,414 | ||
| Token Use | |||
| Output Tokens per Task | 67.9k | 96.1k | |
| Reasoning Tokens per Task | 38.7k | 58.6k | |
| Output Tokens to Run Intelligence Index | 72.8M | 113M | |
| Performance | |||
| Time per Task | 8.8 min | 12.1 min | |
| Output Speed | 128 tok/s | 132 tok/s | |
| Time to First Answer Token | 10.24s | 20.56s | |
| Time to First Token | 10.24s | 20.56s | |
| End-to-End Time (Mean of Single-Request Workloads) | 35.00s | 63.55s | |
| Technical specifications | |||
| Context Window | 1M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | 1M tokens~1,573 A4 pages of size 12 Arial font | |
| Release Date | October 2026 | October 2026 | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Input modality | Supports: text, image, speech, and video | Supports: text, image, speech, and video | |
| Output modality | Supports: text | Supports: text | |
| Open Source (Weights) | No | No | |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Artificial Analysis Finance & Accounting Index
Evaluations
Agentic knowledge work, Elo
Knowledge
1 - hallucination rate
Agentic SaaS workflows
Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal
Agentic software engineering in open-source repositories
Reasoning & knowledge
Professional document reasoning, All-pass
Agentic coding & terminal use
Physics reasoning
Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents
Legal agentic work, Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate
Agentic business operations
Agentic real-world work tasks, Elo
Agentic interactive 3D experiences, Elo
Product and brand videos designed in code, Elo
Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis
Medical long context reasoning
Visual reasoning
Rich, varied, well-crafted language
Well-structured, scannable, answer-first
Truthful, acknowledges uncertainty, non-sycophantic
Use of filler and generic language
AA-Briefcase v1.1
AA-Briefcase Elo
AA-Omniscience v1.1
AA-Omniscience Net Score
AA-PersonalityBench
Personality Indexes
Token Use
Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output
Context Window
Context Window
Performance
Measured by time per task (minutes), output speed (tokens per second), time to first answer token and time to first token (seconds)
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Output Speed
Time to First Answer Token
Frequently Asked Questions
Muse Wonder (Max) is more intelligent. Muse Wonder (Max) scores 44, compared with Muse Wonder (High) at 41 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index.
Muse Wonder (High) is faster. Muse Wonder (High) takes 8.8 minutes per Intelligence Index task (based on Meta's API), compared with Muse Wonder (Max) at 12.1 minutes (based on Meta's API). Lower is better.
Both Muse Wonder (High) (based on Meta's API) and Muse Wonder (Max) (based on Meta's API) cost $2.94 per 1M tokens (7:2:1 cache hit/input/output ratio).
Muse Wonder (High) has lower latency. Muse Wonder (High) has a time to first answer token of 10.24s (based on Meta's API), compared with Muse Wonder (Max) at 20.56s (based on Meta's API).
Both models have a context window of 1M tokens.