Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 vs Gemma 4 E2B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 and Gemma 4 E2B releases: 1 model and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 3 models.
| Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Gemma 4 E2B | Gemma 4 E2B (non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 30 | -- | -- |
| Finance & Accounting | 43 | -- | -- |
| Strategy & Ops | 48 | -- | -- |
| Legal | 36 | -- | -- |
| Healthcare & Medical | 38 | -- | -- |
| Cost per TaskUSD | $3.19 | -- | -- |
| Time per TaskMinutes | -- | -- | -- |
| Time to First Answer Tokens | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1M | 128k | 128k |
| Creator | |||
| License | Open | Open | Open |
| Input Modality | Supports: text | Supports: text, image, speech, and video | Supports: text, image, speech, and video |
| Output Modality | Supports: text | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image |
| Providers | -- | -- | |
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Performance
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Capability Scores
Capability Indexes
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode-AA 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better