All MicroEvals
I want ONE definitive ranking of these models specifically f...
Create MicroEval

I want ONE definitive ranking of these models specifically f...

Prompt

I want ONE definitive ranking of these models specifically for a heavy professional web developer: 1. Muse 1.3 β€” muse-spark-1.3-contributor 2. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 3. Nemotron 3.5 Ultra Free 4. Ling 3.0 Flash β€” ling-3.0-flash-fin 5. Space Bunny β€” space-bunny 6. LongCat 2.5 β€” longcat-2.5-preview 7. MiMo 2.6 β€” mimo-v2.6-flash 8. Big Pickle My workload is NOT simple coding. I work on large, complex production projects, modify huge existing codebases, make architectural changes, refactor across many files, debug difficult issues, use coding agents for long sessions, and expect the model to understand and safely modify a large amount of existing code. Do the research and benchmark comparison yourself. Consider coding ability, reasoning, agentic performance, large-codebase handling, context utilization, instruction following, reliability over long tasks, refactoring, debugging, and ability to make substantial multi-file changes. Do NOT give me a "pros and cons" list for every model. Do NOT give me generic explanations. Do NOT tell me "it depends." Do NOT make me choose based on different categories. Instead, combine everything into ONE overall judgment for MY workload and give me a straight ranking: #1 #2 #3 ... #8 For each position, give ONLY: - Model name - One very short sentence explaining why it occupies that position. Then give me a final line: "THE MODEL I WOULD ACTUALLY USE: [model]" I want the real overall ranking, not a diplomatic comparison. If one model is clearly superior for my workload, put it #1. If a model is mediocre despite having good benchmarks in some area, rank it accordingly. Important: I care about actual performance on huge, serious web-development projects much more than raw speed or how cheap/free the model is. Do not let price distort the ranking.

Drag to resize
Drag to resize
Drag to resize