モデル比較:知能、性能、料金の分析

Microevals Playground
品質、料金、出力速度、遅延、コンテキストウィンドウなどの主要な性能指標でAIモデルを比較・分析します。モデルをクリックすると詳細な指標を確認できます。方法論などの詳細は、よくある質問をご覧ください。

知能

知能が最も高いモデルはClaude Opus 5 (max)のロゴ Claude Opus 5 (max)Claude Opus 5 (xhigh)のロゴ Claude Opus 5 (xhigh)で、Claude Fable 5 (with fallback)のロゴ Claude Fable 5 (with fallback)GPT-5.6 Sol (max)のロゴ GPT-5.6 Sol (max)が続きます。

出力速度(トークン/秒)

最速のモデルはCeleris-1のロゴ Celeris-1 (2034 t/s)Mercury 2のロゴ Mercury 2 (786 t/s)で、LFM2.5-VL-1.6Bのロゴ LFM2.5-VL-1.6BStep 3.7 Flashのロゴ Step 3.7 Flashが続きます。

遅延(秒)

遅延が最も短いモデルはGemini 2.5 Flash-Liteのロゴ Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (0.33s)Command A+のロゴ Command A+ (0.44s)で、Gemini 2.5 Flashのロゴ Gemini 2.5 FlashGrok 4.20 0309 v2のロゴ Grok 4.20 0309 v2が続きます。

料金(100万トークンあたり$)

最も安価なモデルはDevstral 2のロゴ Devstral 2 ($0.00)North Mini Codeのロゴ North Mini Code ($0.00)で、Gemma 3 4Bのロゴ Gemma 3 4BGemma 3 27Bのロゴ Gemma 3 27Bが続きます。

コンテキストウィンドウ

コンテキストウィンドウが最大のモデルはLlama 4 Scoutのロゴ Llama 4 Scout (10M)Grok 4.20 0309のロゴ Grok 4.20 0309 (2M)で、Gemini 1.5 Pro (May)のロゴ Gemini 1.5 Pro (May)Grok 4.1 Fastのロゴ Grok 4.1 Fastが続きます。

ハイライト

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

知能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Open Weights / Proprietary

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Indicates whether the model weights are available. Models are labelled as 'Commercial Use Restricted' if the weights are available but commercial use is limited (typically requires obtaining a paid license).

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic tool use

Agentic coding & terminal use

Coding

Reasoning & knowledge

Scientific reasoning

Physics reasoning

Long context reasoning

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

Agentic SaaS workflows

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

Agentic business operations

Instruction following

Long-horizon agentic tasks

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

Visual reasoning

Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

AA-Briefcase

AA-Briefcase Elo

AA-Briefcase is an agentic knowledge work benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis. AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates rubric pass rate, analytical quality Elo and presentation Elo · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Briefcase Elo is a combined metric that aggregates analytical quality Elo, presentation Elo, and rubric pass rate, with rubric performance converted into Elo via synthetic head-to-head matches. Elo and 95% confidence interval bounds are clamped at 0.

AA-Omniscience

AA-Omniscience Index

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

AA-Omniscience Index (higher is better) measures knowledge reliability and hallucination. It rewards correct answers, penalizes hallucinations, and has no penalty for refusing to answer. Scores range from -100 to 100, where 0 means as many correct as incorrect answers, and negative scores mean more incorrect than correct.

Openness Index

Artificial Analysis Openness Index: Score

Openness Index assesses model openness on a 0 to 100 normalized scale (higher is more open)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Intelligence Indexの比較

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

トークン使用量

Output Tokens per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average number of output tokens used to run one task in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The number of tokens required per Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by multiplying the output tokens per eval by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index, then dividing by task count (excluding repeats).

費用

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task, segmented by token type. Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost to Run Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost (USD) to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The cost to run the evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, calculated using the model's input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices and the number of tokens used across evaluations (excluding repeats).

Pricing: Cache Hit, Input, and Output

Price (USD per M Tokens)
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Price per token for cached prompts (previously processed), typically offering a significant discount compared to regular input price, represented as USD per million tokens. The values shown here are the cache hit price; cache write and cache storage are billed separately and vary by provider — see "Cache pricing by provider" for detail.

コンテキストウィンドウ

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

速度

出力速度(1秒あたりのトークン数)で測定

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average decode time (minutes) per task; excludes TTFT and overhead time · Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The weighted average time (seconds) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task. This is calculated by dividing output tokens per task by output speed, weighted by the relative weights of each benchmark in the Intelligence Index.

遅延

最初のトークンまでの時間(秒)で測定

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.

エンドツーエンド応答時間

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time

Seconds to output 500 tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time · Lower is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Seconds to receive a 500 token response. Key components:

  • Input time: Time to receive the first response token
  • Thinking time (only for reasoning models): Time reasoning models spend outputting tokens to reason prior to providing an answer. Amount of tokens based on the average reasoning tokens across a diverse set of 60 prompts (methodology details).
  • Answer time: Time to generate 500 output tokens, based on output speed

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

モデル規模(オープンウェイトモデルのみ)

Model Size: Total and Active Parameters

Comparison between total model parameters and parameters active during inference
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

The total number of trainable weights and biases in the model, expressed in billions. These parameters are learned during training and determine the model's ability to process and generate responses.

The number of parameters actually executed during each inference forward pass, expressed in billions. For Mixture of Experts (MoE) models, a routing mechanism selects a subset of experts per token, resulting in fewer active than total parameters. Dense models use all parameters, so active equals total.

よくある質問

現在、Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)が61のスコアでArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexの首位です。評価対象は175モデルです。

Intelligence Indexで上位のAIモデルは1位:Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)(61)、2位:Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort)(60)、3位:Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)(60)、4位:GPT-5.6 Sol (max)(59)、5位:Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort)(59)です。

Celeris-1が毎秒2,033.7トークンで最速で、Mercury 2(785.6 t/s)、LFM2.5-VL-1.6B(471.1 t/s)が続きます。

Nova Microが100万トークンあたり$0.03(ブレンド料金)で最も安価で、Sarvam 30B (high)($0.03)、Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning)($0.03)が続きます。

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Non-reasoning)の最初のトークンまでの時間が0.33秒で最短で、Command A+(0.44秒)、Gemini 2.5 Flash (Non-reasoning)(0.53秒)が続きます。

Kimi K3 (max)がIntelligence Indexスコア57で、オープンウェイトモデルの最上位です。評価対象の全175モデル中、オープンウェイトモデルは99モデルです。

Intelligence Indexで上位のオープンウェイトAIモデルは1位:Kimi K3 (max)(57)、2位:GLM-5.2 (max)(51)、3位:DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort)(50)です。

Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)がIntelligence Indexスコア61で、130推論モデルの首位です。推論モデルは回答前に拡張思考を行い、複雑な問題に取り組みます。

知能(品質)、料金、出力速度(1秒あたりのトークン数)、遅延(最初のトークンまでの時間)、エンドツーエンド応答時間、コンテキストウィンドウの規模など、複数の側面でモデルを比較します。性能指標は、標準化したプロンプトを使って591モデルで直接測定します。

グラフ内のモデル名または行をクリックすると、詳細な指標と類似モデルとの直接比較を掲載した専用ページを表示できます。モデル選択機能を使って、各グラフに表示するモデルを変更することもできます。 リーダーボードを表示