Mistral Vibe vs. Muse Code

Comparison between Mistral Vibe and Muse Code across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Mistral Vibe and Muse Code.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
Mistral Vibe
Mistral Large 4 (High)
Muse Code
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
Analysis
Agent Harness
Mistral Vibe
Muse Code
Representative Model
Mistral Large 4 (High)
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
Coding Agent Index
48
59
Muse Code has a higher Coding Agent Index than Mistral Vibe
FrontierCode v1.1
45%
49%
Muse Code has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than Mistral Vibe
Terminal-Bench 4.0
41%
59%
Muse Code has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Mistral Vibe
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA
59%
69%
Muse Code has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than Mistral Vibe
Cost per Task
$1.26
$0.00
Comparison not available
Time per Task
48.4m
34.9m
Muse Code has a lower time per task than Mistral Vibe
Turns per Task
100.1
194.9
Mistral Vibe has a lower turns per task than Muse Code
Token Usage per Task
8.5M
14.5M
Mistral Vibe has a lower token usage per task than Muse Code
Cache Hit Rate
91%
96%
Muse Code has a higher cache hit rate than Mistral Vibe

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Mistral Vibe and Muse Code.

Model Variants

Mistral Vibe
Mistral Large 4 (High)
48
45%
41%
59%
$1.26
48.4m
8.5M
Mistral Vibe
Mistral Large 4 (Medium)
35
35%
26%
45%
$0.78
38.8m
5.8M
Muse Code
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
59
49%
59%
69%
$0.00
34.9m
14.5M
Muse Code
Muse Wonder (Max)
52
46%
48%
62%
$8.05
24.5m
14.5M
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
46
47%
32%
59%
$3.91
23.3m
17.8M
Muse Code
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
26
23%
6%
51%
$3.54
26.0m
13.3M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant