Mirror vs. Muse Code

Comparison between Mirror and Muse Code across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 · Higher is better
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Mirror and Muse Code.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
Mirror
Beam 1.0
Muse Code
Muse Wonder Full (max)
Analysis
Agent Harness
Mirror
Muse Code
Representative Model
Beam 1.0
Muse Wonder Full (max)
Coding Agent Index
28
68
Muse Code has a higher Coding Agent Index than Mirror
DeepSWE v1.1
40%
77%
Muse Code has a higher DeepSWE v1.1 score than Mirror
Terminal-Bench 4.0
4%
59%
Muse Code has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Mirror
SWE-Atlas-QnA
40%
68%
Muse Code has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA score than Mirror
Cost per Task
$0.00
$0.00
Comparison not available
Time per Task
42.4m
28.8m
Muse Code has a lower time per task than Mirror
Turns per Task
95.9
195
Mirror has a lower turns per task than Muse Code
Token Usage per Task
5.1M
15M
Mirror has a lower token usage per task than Muse Code
Cache Hit Rate
0.0%
96%
Muse Code has a higher cache hit rate than Mirror

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Mirror and Muse Code.

Model Variants

Mirror
Beam 1.0
28
40%
4%
40%
$0.00
42.4m
5.1M
Muse Code
Muse Wonder Full (max)
68
77%
59%
68%
$0.00
28.8m
15M
Muse Code
Muse Wonder (max)
63
76%
47%
67%
$8.05
22.4m
15M
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
54
72%
32%
59%
$3.98
18.4m
16.7M
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)
48
73%
17%
55%
$3.47
18.3m
16.2M
Muse Code
Muse Spark Open (xhigh)
41
60%
6%
58%
$3.33
25.2m
16.3M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 incorporates 3 benchmarks: DeepSWE v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA · Higher is better

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Most attractive quadrant
No data available

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
No data available

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Most attractive quadrant