Grok Build vs. Muse Code

Comparison between Grok Build and Muse Code across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 · Higher is better
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Grok Build and Muse Code.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
Grok Build
Grok 4.7 (xhigh)
Muse Code
Muse Wonder Full (max)
Analysis
Agent Harness
Grok Build
Muse Code
Representative Model
Grok 4.7 (xhigh)
Muse Wonder Full (max)
Coding Agent Index
56
68
Muse Code has a higher Coding Agent Index than Grok Build
DeepSWE v1.1
73%
77%
Muse Code has a higher DeepSWE v1.1 score than Grok Build
Terminal-Bench 4.0
33%
59%
Muse Code has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Grok Build
SWE-Atlas-QnA
63%
68%
Muse Code has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA score than Grok Build
Cost per Task
$8.82
$0.00
Comparison not available
Time per Task
39.2m
28.8m
Muse Code has a lower time per task than Grok Build
Turns per Task
162.6
195
Grok Build has a lower turns per task than Muse Code
Token Usage per Task
14.3M
15M
Grok Build has a lower token usage per task than Muse Code
Cache Hit Rate
94%
96%
Muse Code has a higher cache hit rate than Grok Build

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Grok Build and Muse Code.

Model Variants

Grok Build
Grok 4.7 (xhigh)
56
73%
33%
63%
$8.82
39.2m
14.3M
Grok Build
Grok 4.6 (xhigh)
47
65%
18%
58%
$3.57
19.5m
5.5M
Muse Code
Muse Wonder Full (max)
68
77%
59%
68%
$0.00
28.8m
15M
Muse Code
Muse Wonder (max)
63
76%
47%
67%
$8.05
22.4m
15M
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
54
72%
32%
59%
$3.98
18.4m
16.7M
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)
48
73%
17%
55%
$3.47
18.3m
16.2M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 incorporates 3 benchmarks: DeepSWE v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA · Higher is better

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Most attractive quadrant

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Most attractive quadrant