GitHub Copilot vs. Muse Code

Comparison between GitHub Copilot and Muse Code across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of GitHub Copilot and Muse Code.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
GitHub Copilot
Copilot Fusion (Max)
Muse Code
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
Analysis
Agent Harness
GitHub Copilot
Muse Code
Representative Model
Copilot Fusion (Max)
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
Coding Agent Index
60
59
GitHub Copilot has a higher Coding Agent Index than Muse Code
FrontierCode v1.1
51%
49%
GitHub Copilot has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than Muse Code
Terminal-Bench 4.0
71%
59%
GitHub Copilot has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Muse Code
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA
57%
69%
Muse Code has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than GitHub Copilot
Cost per Task
$5.59
$0.00
Comparison not available
Time per Task
36.1m
34.9m
Muse Code has a lower time per task than GitHub Copilot
Turns per Task
171
194.9
GitHub Copilot has a lower turns per task than Muse Code
Token Usage per Task
7.3M
14.5M
GitHub Copilot has a lower token usage per task than Muse Code
Cache Hit Rate
97%
96%
GitHub Copilot has a higher cache hit rate than Muse Code

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for GitHub Copilot and Muse Code.

Model Variants

GitHub Copilot
Copilot Fusion (Max)
60
51%
71%
57%
$5.59
36.1m
7.3M
Muse Code
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
59
49%
59%
69%
$0.00
34.9m
14.5M
Muse Code
Muse Wonder (Max)
52
46%
48%
62%
$8.05
24.5m
14.5M
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
46
47%
32%
59%
$3.91
23.3m
17.8M
Muse Code
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
26
23%
6%
51%
$3.54
26.0m
13.3M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant