Devin Fusion CLI vs. Muse Code

Comparison between Devin Fusion CLI and Muse Code across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs

Highlights

Updated
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 · Higher is better
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Devin Fusion CLI and Muse Code.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
Devin Fusion CLI
Claude Fable 5.1 XHigh + SWE-2 Medium
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
Analysis
Agent Harness
Devin Fusion CLI
Muse Code
Representative Model
Claude Fable 5.1 XHigh + SWE-2 Medium
Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
Coding Agent Index
62
54
Devin Fusion CLI has a higher Coding Agent Index than Muse Code
DeepSWE v1.1
63%
72%
Muse Code has a higher DeepSWE v1.1 score than Devin Fusion CLI
Terminal-Bench 4.0
56%
32%
Devin Fusion CLI has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Muse Code
SWE-Atlas-QnA
66%
59%
Devin Fusion CLI has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA score than Muse Code
Cost per Task
$7.90
$3.98
Muse Code has a lower cost per task than Devin Fusion CLI
Time per Task
35.8m
18.4m
Muse Code has a lower time per task than Devin Fusion CLI
Turns per Task
99.5
185.2
Devin Fusion CLI has a lower turns per task than Muse Code
Token Usage per Task
9.7M
16.7M
Devin Fusion CLI has a lower token usage per task than Muse Code
Cache Hit Rate
96%
97%
Muse Code has a higher cache hit rate than Devin Fusion CLI

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Devin Fusion CLI and Muse Code.

Model Variants

Devin Fusion CLI
Claude Fable 5.1 XHigh + SWE-2 Medium
62
63%
56%
66%
$7.90
35.8m
9.7M
Devin Fusion CLI
GPT-6 Astra XHigh + SWE-2 Medium
59
67%
50%
59%
$4.54
24.7m
6.1M
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
54
72%
32%
59%
$3.98
18.4m
16.7M
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)
48
73%
17%
55%
$3.45
18.3m
16.2M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 incorporates 3 benchmarks: DeepSWE v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA · Higher is better

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Most attractive quadrant