Coding Agent Benchmarks

Devin Fusion CLI vs. Muse Code

Comparison between Devin Fusion CLI and Muse Code across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs

Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Cost per Task

Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Devin Fusion CLI and Muse Code.

Metric
Devin Fusion CLI
Claude Opus 5.5 Max + GPT-6 Luna High
Muse Code
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
Analysis
Agent Harness
Devin Fusion CLI
Muse Code
Representative Model
Claude Opus 5.5 Max + GPT-6 Luna High
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
Coding Agent Index
62
59
Devin Fusion CLI has a higher Coding Agent Index than Muse Code
FrontierCode v1.1
54
49
Devin Fusion CLI has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than Muse Code
Terminal-Bench 4.0
63
59
Devin Fusion CLI has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Muse Code
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA
68
69
Muse Code has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than Devin Fusion CLI
Cost per Task
$8.00
-
Comparison not available
Time per Task
51.1m
34.9m
Muse Code has a lower time per task than Devin Fusion CLI
Turns per Task
99.5
194.9
Devin Fusion CLI has a lower turns per task than Muse Code
Token Usage per Task
10.5M
14.5M
Devin Fusion CLI has a lower token usage per task than Muse Code
Cache Hit Rate
87%
96%
Muse Code has a higher cache hit rate than Devin Fusion CLI

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Devin Fusion CLI and Muse Code.

Devin Fusion CLI
Claude Opus 5.5 Max + GPT-6 Luna High
-
62
54
63
68
$8.00
51.1m
10.5M
Devin Fusion CLI
Claude Fable 5.1 XHigh + SWE-2 Medium
-
59
52
56
68
$8.20
37.6m
9.81M
Devin Fusion CLI
GPT-6 Astra XHigh + SWE-2 Medium
-
53
49
50
60
$4.34
21.2m
3.63M
Muse Code
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
max
59
49
59
69
-
34.9m
14.5M
Muse Code
Muse Wonder (Max)
max
52
46
48
62
$8.05
24.5m
14.5M
Muse Code
Muse Ember (Max)
max
46
40
43
55
-
19.2m
18.8M
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
max
46
47
32
59
$3.91
23.3m
17.8M
Muse Code
Muse Ember (Xhigh)
xhigh
40
37
28
54
-
21.2m
17M
Muse Code
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
xhigh
26
23
6
51
$3.54
26.0m
13.3M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant