Devin Fusion CLI vs. Mirror

Comparison between Devin Fusion CLI and Mirror across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Devin Fusion CLI and Mirror.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
Devin Fusion CLI
Claude Opus 5.5 Max + GPT-6 Luna High
Mirror
Beam 1.0
Analysis
Agent Harness
Devin Fusion CLI
Mirror
Representative Model
Claude Opus 5.5 Max + GPT-6 Luna High
Beam 1.0
Coding Agent Index
62
20
Devin Fusion CLI has a higher Coding Agent Index than Mirror
FrontierCode v1.1
54%
20%
Devin Fusion CLI has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than Mirror
Terminal-Bench 4.0
63%
4%
Devin Fusion CLI has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Mirror
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA
68%
38%
Devin Fusion CLI has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than Mirror
Cost per Task
$8.00
$0.32
Mirror has a lower cost per task than Devin Fusion CLI
Time per Task
51.1m
38.7m
Mirror has a lower time per task than Devin Fusion CLI
Turns per Task
99.5
93
Mirror has a lower turns per task than Devin Fusion CLI
Token Usage per Task
10.5M
4.89M
Mirror has a lower token usage per task than Devin Fusion CLI
Cache Hit Rate
87%
95%
Mirror has a higher cache hit rate than Devin Fusion CLI

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Devin Fusion CLI and Mirror.

Model Variants

Devin Fusion CLI
Claude Opus 5.5 Max + GPT-6 Luna High
-
62
54%
63%
68%
$8.00
51.1m
10.5M
Devin Fusion CLI
Claude Fable 5.1 XHigh + SWE-2 Medium
-
59
52%
56%
68%
$8.20
37.6m
9.81M
Devin Fusion CLI
GPT-6 Astra XHigh + SWE-2 Medium
-
53
49%
50%
60%
$4.34
21.2m
3.63M
Mirror
Beam 1.0
reasoning
20
20%
4%
38%
$0.32
38.7m
4.89M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant