Devin Fusion CLI vs. Grok Build
Comparison between Devin Fusion CLI and Grok Build across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.
For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.
Explore other comparisons
vs
Highlights
Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of Devin Fusion CLI and Grok Build.
Coding Agent Comparison
Metric | Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Agent Harness | Devin Fusion CLI | Grok Build | |
Representative Model | Claude Fable 5.1 XHigh + SWE-2 Medium | Grok 4.6 (xhigh) | |
Coding Agent Index | 62 | 47 | Devin Fusion CLI has a higher Coding Agent Index than Grok Build |
DeepSWE v1.1 | 63% | 65% | Grok Build has a higher DeepSWE v1.1 score than Devin Fusion CLI |
Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 56% | 18% | Devin Fusion CLI has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Grok Build |
SWE-Atlas-QnA | 66% | 58% | Devin Fusion CLI has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA score than Grok Build |
Cost per Task | $7.90 | $3.57 | Grok Build has a lower cost per task than Devin Fusion CLI |
Time per Task | 35.8m | 19.5m | Grok Build has a lower time per task than Devin Fusion CLI |
Turns per Task | 99.5 | 112.1 | Devin Fusion CLI has a lower turns per task than Grok Build |
Token Usage per Task | 9.7M | 5.5M | Grok Build has a lower token usage per task than Devin Fusion CLI |
Cache Hit Rate | 96% | 91% | Devin Fusion CLI has a higher cache hit rate than Grok Build |
Model Variants
Evaluated model variants for Devin Fusion CLI and Grok Build.
Model Variants
62 | 63% | 56% | 66% | $7.90 | 35.8m | 9.7M | ||
59 | 67% | 50% | 59% | $4.54 | 24.7m | 6.1M | ||
47 | 65% | 18% | 58% | $3.57 | 19.5m | 5.5M |
Performance
Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 incorporates 3 benchmarks: DeepSWE v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA · Higher is better
Color by
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Token Usage
Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
Token Usage per Task
Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Cost
Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.
Cost per Task
Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by
Execution Time
Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
Time per Task
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant