Coding Agent Benchmarks

DeepSeek Harness vs. Muse Code

Comparison between DeepSeek Harness and Muse Code across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek Harness and Muse Code.

Metric
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
Analysis
Agent Harness
DeepSeek Harness
Muse Code
Representative Model
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
Coding Agent Index
46
59
Muse Code has a higher Coding Agent Index than DeepSeek Harness
FrontierCode v1.1
47
49
Muse Code has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than DeepSeek Harness
Terminal-Bench 4.0
31
59
Muse Code has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than DeepSeek Harness
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA
62
69
Muse Code has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than DeepSeek Harness
Cost per Task
$0.30
-
Comparison not available
Time per Task
21.4m
34.9m
DeepSeek Harness has a lower time per task than Muse Code
Turns per Task
101.5
194.9
DeepSeek Harness has a lower turns per task than Muse Code
Token Usage per Task
16.7M
14.5M
Muse Code has a lower token usage per task than DeepSeek Harness
Cache Hit Rate
97%
96%
DeepSeek Harness has a higher cache hit rate than Muse Code

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for DeepSeek Harness and Muse Code.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
max
46
47
31
62
$0.30
21.4m
16.7M
Muse Wonder Full (Max)
max
59
49
59
69
-
34.9m
14.5M
Muse Wonder (Max)
max
52
46
48
62
$8.05
24.5m
14.5M
Muse Ember (Max)
max
46
40
43
55
-
19.2m
18.8M
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
max
46
47
32
59
$3.91
23.3m
17.8M
Muse Ember (Xhigh)
xhigh
40
37
28
54
-
21.2m
17M
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
xhigh
26
23
6
51
$3.54
26.0m
13.3M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant