DeepSeek Harness vs. Mistral Vibe

Comparison between DeepSeek Harness and Mistral Vibe across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek Harness and Mistral Vibe.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
DeepSeek Harness
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
Mistral Vibe
Mistral Large 4 (High)
Analysis
Agent Harness
DeepSeek Harness
Mistral Vibe
Representative Model
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
Mistral Large 4 (High)
Coding Agent Index
46
48
Mistral Vibe has a higher Coding Agent Index than DeepSeek Harness
FrontierCode v1.1
47%
45%
DeepSeek Harness has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than Mistral Vibe
Terminal-Bench 4.0
31%
41%
Mistral Vibe has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than DeepSeek Harness
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA
62%
59%
DeepSeek Harness has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than Mistral Vibe
Cost per Task
$0.30
$1.26
DeepSeek Harness has a lower cost per task than Mistral Vibe
Time per Task
21.4m
48.4m
DeepSeek Harness has a lower time per task than Mistral Vibe
Turns per Task
101.5
100.1
Mistral Vibe has a lower turns per task than DeepSeek Harness
Token Usage per Task
16.7M
8.5M
Mistral Vibe has a lower token usage per task than DeepSeek Harness
Cache Hit Rate
97%
91%
DeepSeek Harness has a higher cache hit rate than Mistral Vibe

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for DeepSeek Harness and Mistral Vibe.

Model Variants

DeepSeek Harness
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
46
47%
31%
62%
$0.30
21.4m
16.7M
Mistral Vibe
Mistral Large 4 (High)
48
45%
41%
59%
$1.26
48.4m
8.5M
Mistral Vibe
Mistral Large 4 (Medium)
35
35%
26%
45%
$0.78
38.8m
5.8M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant