DeepSeek Harness vs. GitHub Copilot

Comparison between DeepSeek Harness and GitHub Copilot across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek Harness and GitHub Copilot.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
DeepSeek Harness
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
GitHub Copilot
Copilot Fusion (Max)
Analysis
Agent Harness
DeepSeek Harness
GitHub Copilot
Representative Model
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
Copilot Fusion (Max)
Coding Agent Index
46
60
GitHub Copilot has a higher Coding Agent Index than DeepSeek Harness
FrontierCode v1.1
47%
51%
GitHub Copilot has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than DeepSeek Harness
Terminal-Bench 4.0
31%
71%
GitHub Copilot has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than DeepSeek Harness
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA
62%
57%
DeepSeek Harness has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than GitHub Copilot
Cost per Task
$0.30
$5.59
DeepSeek Harness has a lower cost per task than GitHub Copilot
Time per Task
21.4m
36.1m
DeepSeek Harness has a lower time per task than GitHub Copilot
Turns per Task
101.5
171
DeepSeek Harness has a lower turns per task than GitHub Copilot
Token Usage per Task
16.7M
7.3M
GitHub Copilot has a lower token usage per task than DeepSeek Harness
Cache Hit Rate
97%
97%
GitHub Copilot has a higher cache hit rate than DeepSeek Harness

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for DeepSeek Harness and GitHub Copilot.

Model Variants

DeepSeek Harness
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)
46
47%
31%
62%
$0.30
21.4m
16.7M
GitHub Copilot
Copilot Fusion (Max)
60
51%
71%
57%
$5.59
36.1m
7.3M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant