DeepSeek Harness vs. Devin Fusion CLI
Comparison between DeepSeek Harness and Devin Fusion CLI across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.
For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.
Explore other comparisons
vs
Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek Harness and Devin Fusion CLI.
Coding Agent Comparison
Metric | Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Agent Harness | DeepSeek Harness | Devin Fusion CLI | |
Representative Model | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | Claude Opus 5.5 Max + GPT-6 Luna High | |
Coding Agent Index | 46 | 62 | Devin Fusion CLI has a higher Coding Agent Index than DeepSeek Harness |
FrontierCode v1.1 | 47% | 54% | Devin Fusion CLI has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than DeepSeek Harness |
Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 31% | 63% | Devin Fusion CLI has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than DeepSeek Harness |
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA | 62% | 68% | Devin Fusion CLI has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than DeepSeek Harness |
Cost per Task | $0.30 | $8.00 | DeepSeek Harness has a lower cost per task than Devin Fusion CLI |
Time per Task | 21.4m | 51.1m | DeepSeek Harness has a lower time per task than Devin Fusion CLI |
Turns per Task | 101.5 | 99.5 | Devin Fusion CLI has a lower turns per task than DeepSeek Harness |
Token Usage per Task | 16.7M | 10.5M | Devin Fusion CLI has a lower token usage per task than DeepSeek Harness |
Cache Hit Rate | 97% | 87% | DeepSeek Harness has a higher cache hit rate than Devin Fusion CLI |
Model Variants
Evaluated model variants for DeepSeek Harness and Devin Fusion CLI.
Model Variants
46 | 47% | 31% | 62% | $0.30 | 21.4m | 16.7M | ||
62 | 54% | 63% | 68% | $8.00 | 51.1m | 10.5M | ||
59 | 52% | 56% | 68% | $8.20 | 37.6m | 9.8M | ||
53 | 49% | 50% | 60% | $4.34 | 21.2m | 3.6M |
Performance
Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Token Usage
Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
Token Usage per Task
Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Cost
Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.
Cost per Task
Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by
Execution Time
Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
Time per Task
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant