Claude Code vs. Muse Code

Comparison between Claude Code and Muse Code across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs

Highlights

Updated
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 · Higher is better
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Claude Code and Muse Code.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
Claude Code
Opus 5.5 (max)
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
Analysis
Agent Harness
Claude Code
Muse Code
Representative Model
Opus 5.5 (max)
Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
Coding Agent Index
66
54
Claude Code has a higher Coding Agent Index than Muse Code
DeepSWE v1.1
68%
72%
Muse Code has a higher DeepSWE v1.1 score than Claude Code
Terminal-Bench 4.0
63%
32%
Claude Code has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Muse Code
SWE-Atlas-QnA
66%
59%
Claude Code has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA score than Muse Code
Cost per Task
$13.04
$3.98
Muse Code has a lower cost per task than Claude Code
Time per Task
1.1h
18.4m
Muse Code has a lower time per task than Claude Code
Turns per Task
155.1
185.2
Claude Code has a lower turns per task than Muse Code
Token Usage per Task
15.6M
16.7M
Claude Code has a lower token usage per task than Muse Code
Cache Hit Rate
95%
97%
Muse Code has a higher cache hit rate than Claude Code

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Claude Code and Muse Code.

Model Variants

Claude Code
Opus 5.5 (max)
66
68%
63%
66%
$13.04
1.1h
15.6M
Claude Code
Fable 5.1 (max) (with fallback)
62
64%
58%
65%
$12.39
34.8m
5.7M
Claude Code
Opus 5 (max)
60
63%
55%
62%
$10.79
41.9m
11.4M
Claude Code
Qwen3.8 Max
43
51%
17%
62%
$3.48
1.1h
8.7M
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (max)
54
72%
32%
59%
$3.98
18.4m
16.7M
Muse Code
Muse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)
48
73%
17%
55%
$3.47
18.3m
16.2M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 incorporates 3 benchmarks: DeepSWE v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA · Higher is better

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Most attractive quadrant