Claude Code vs. Kimi Code CLI
Comparison between Claude Code and Kimi Code CLI across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.
For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.
Explore other comparisons
vs
Highlights
Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of Claude Code and Kimi Code CLI.
Coding Agent Comparison
Metric | Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Agent Harness | Claude Code | Kimi Code CLI | |
Representative Model | Fable 5.1 (max) (with fallback) | Kimi K3 | |
Coding Agent Index | 62 | 52 | Claude Code has a higher Coding Agent Index than Kimi Code CLI |
DeepSWE v1.1 | 64% | 68% | Kimi Code CLI has a higher DeepSWE v1.1 score than Claude Code |
Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 58% | 21% | Claude Code has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Kimi Code CLI |
SWE-Atlas-QnA | 65% | 66% | Kimi Code CLI has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA score than Claude Code |
Cost per Task | $12.39 | $5.05 | Kimi Code CLI has a lower cost per task than Claude Code |
Time per Task | 34.8m | 1.0h | Claude Code has a lower time per task than Kimi Code CLI |
Turns per Task | 36.7 | 173.4 | Claude Code has a lower turns per task than Kimi Code CLI |
Token Usage per Task | 5.7M | 8.5M | Claude Code has a lower token usage per task than Kimi Code CLI |
Cache Hit Rate | 92% | 95% | Kimi Code CLI has a higher cache hit rate than Claude Code |
Model Variants
Evaluated model variants for Claude Code and Kimi Code CLI.
Model Variants
62 | 64% | 58% | 65% | $12.39 | 34.8m | 5.7M | ||
60 | 63% | 55% | 62% | $10.79 | 41.9m | 11.4M | ||
43 | 51% | 17% | 62% | $3.48 | 1.1h | 8.7M | ||
52 | 68% | 21% | 66% | $5.05 | 1.0h | 8.5M |
Performance
Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 incorporates 3 benchmarks: DeepSWE v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA · Higher is better
Color by
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Token Usage
Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
Token Usage per Task
Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Cost
Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.
Cost per Task
Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by
Execution Time
Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
Time per Task
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant