Antigravity SDK vs. Claude Code

Comparison between Antigravity SDK and Claude Code across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs

Highlights

Updated
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 · Higher is better
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Antigravity SDK and Claude Code.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
Antigravity SDK
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
Claude Code
Opus 5.5 (max)
Analysis
Agent Harness
Antigravity SDK
Claude Code
Representative Model
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
Opus 5.5 (max)
Coding Agent Index
42
66
Claude Code has a higher Coding Agent Index than Antigravity SDK
DeepSWE v1.1
66%
68%
Claude Code has a higher DeepSWE v1.1 score than Antigravity SDK
Terminal-Bench 4.0
15%
63%
Claude Code has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Antigravity SDK
SWE-Atlas-QnA
45%
66%
Claude Code has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA score than Antigravity SDK
Cost per Task
$2.47
$13.04
Antigravity SDK has a lower cost per task than Claude Code
Time per Task
11.7m
1.1h
Antigravity SDK has a lower time per task than Claude Code
Turns per Task
188.5
155.1
Claude Code has a lower turns per task than Antigravity SDK
Token Usage per Task
13.5M
15.6M
Antigravity SDK has a lower token usage per task than Claude Code
Cache Hit Rate
87%
95%
Claude Code has a higher cache hit rate than Antigravity SDK

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Antigravity SDK and Claude Code.

Model Variants

Antigravity SDK
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)
42
66%
15%
45%
$2.47
11.7m
13.5M
Claude Code
Opus 5.5 (max)
66
68%
63%
66%
$13.04
1.1h
15.6M
Claude Code
Fable 5.1 (max) (with fallback)
62
64%
58%
65%
$12.39
34.8m
5.7M
Claude Code
Opus 5 (max)
60
63%
55%
62%
$10.79
41.9m
11.4M
Claude Code
Qwen3.8 Max
43
51%
17%
62%
$3.48
1.1h
8.7M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v1.5 incorporates 3 benchmarks: DeepSWE v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA · Higher is better

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Most attractive quadrant