Antigravity CLI vs. Opencode

Comparison between Antigravity CLI and Opencode across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better
No publicly available API
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
No publicly available API
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Antigravity CLI and Opencode.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Opencode
GLM-5.3 (Max)
Analysis
Agent Harness
Antigravity CLI
Opencode
Representative Model
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
GLM-5.3 (Max)
Coding Agent Index
59
49
Antigravity CLI has a higher Coding Agent Index than Opencode
FrontierCode v1.1
51
48
Antigravity CLI has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than Opencode
Terminal-Bench 4.0
64
40
Antigravity CLI has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Opencode
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA
64
59
Antigravity CLI has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than Opencode
Cost per Task
$7.74
$5.23
Opencode has a lower cost per task than Antigravity CLI
Time per Task
29.8m
56.2m
Antigravity CLI has a lower time per task than Opencode
Turns per Task
177.8
111.5
Opencode has a lower turns per task than Antigravity CLI
Token Usage per Task
12.5M
15.9M
Antigravity CLI has a lower token usage per task than Opencode
Cache Hit Rate
95%
95%
Both agents have the same cache hit rate

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Antigravity CLI and Opencode.

Model Variants

Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
high
59
51
64
64
$7.74
29.8m
12.5M
Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Argon (High)
high
53
49
56
55
$11.73
34.7m
13.9M
Opencode
GLM-5.3 (Max)
max
49
48
40
59
$5.23
56.2m
15.9M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by
Not publicly available

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by
Not publicly available

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by
Not publicly available

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant