Antigravity CLI vs. Mistral Vibe
Comparison between Antigravity CLI and Mistral Vibe across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.
For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.
Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better
No publicly available API
Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of Antigravity CLI and Mistral Vibe.
Coding Agent Comparison
Metric | Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Agent Harness | Antigravity CLI | Mistral Vibe | |
Representative Model | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Mistral Large 4 (High) | |
Coding Agent Index | 59 | 48 | Antigravity CLI has a higher Coding Agent Index than Mistral Vibe |
FrontierCode v1.1 | 51% | 45% | Antigravity CLI has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than Mistral Vibe |
Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 64% | 41% | Antigravity CLI has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Mistral Vibe |
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA | 64% | 59% | Antigravity CLI has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than Mistral Vibe |
Cost per Task | $7.74 | $1.26 | Mistral Vibe has a lower cost per task than Antigravity CLI |
Time per Task | 29.8m | 48.4m | Antigravity CLI has a lower time per task than Mistral Vibe |
Turns per Task | 177.8 | 100.1 | Mistral Vibe has a lower turns per task than Antigravity CLI |
Token Usage per Task | 12.5M | 8.5M | Mistral Vibe has a lower token usage per task than Antigravity CLI |
Cache Hit Rate | 95% | 91% | Antigravity CLI has a higher cache hit rate than Mistral Vibe |
Model Variants
Evaluated model variants for Antigravity CLI and Mistral Vibe.
Model Variants
59 | 51% | 64% | 64% | $7.74 | 29.8m | 12.5M | ||
53 | 49% | 56% | 55% | $11.73 | 34.7m | 13.9M | ||
48 | 45% | 41% | 59% | $1.26 | 48.4m | 8.5M | ||
35 | 35% | 26% | 45% | $0.78 | 38.8m | 5.8M |
Performance
Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by
Not publicly available
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Token Usage
Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
Token Usage per Task
Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Cost
Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.
Cost per Task
Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by
Not publicly available
Execution Time
Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.
Time per Task
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by
Not publicly available
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant