Antigravity CLI vs. Mistral Vibe

Comparison between Antigravity CLI and Mistral Vibe across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better
No publicly available API
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
No publicly available API
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Antigravity CLI and Mistral Vibe.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Mistral Vibe
Mistral Large 4 (High)
Analysis
Agent Harness
Antigravity CLI
Mistral Vibe
Representative Model
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Mistral Large 4 (High)
Coding Agent Index
59
48
Antigravity CLI has a higher Coding Agent Index than Mistral Vibe
FrontierCode v1.1
51%
45%
Antigravity CLI has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than Mistral Vibe
Terminal-Bench 4.0
64%
41%
Antigravity CLI has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Mistral Vibe
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA
64%
59%
Antigravity CLI has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than Mistral Vibe
Cost per Task
$7.74
$1.26
Mistral Vibe has a lower cost per task than Antigravity CLI
Time per Task
29.8m
48.4m
Antigravity CLI has a lower time per task than Mistral Vibe
Turns per Task
177.8
100.1
Mistral Vibe has a lower turns per task than Antigravity CLI
Token Usage per Task
12.5M
8.5M
Mistral Vibe has a lower token usage per task than Antigravity CLI
Cache Hit Rate
95%
91%
Antigravity CLI has a higher cache hit rate than Mistral Vibe

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Antigravity CLI and Mistral Vibe.

Model Variants

Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
59
51%
64%
64%
$7.74
29.8m
12.5M
Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Argon (High)
53
49%
56%
55%
$11.73
34.7m
13.9M
Mistral Vibe
Mistral Large 4 (High)
48
45%
41%
59%
$1.26
48.4m
8.5M
Mistral Vibe
Mistral Large 4 (Medium)
35
35%
26%
45%
$0.78
38.8m
5.8M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by
Not publicly available

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by
Not publicly available

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by
Not publicly available

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant