Antigravity CLI vs. Kimi Code CLI

Comparison between Antigravity CLI and Kimi Code CLI across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better
No publicly available API
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
No publicly available API
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Antigravity CLI and Kimi Code CLI.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Kimi Code CLI
Kimi K3 (Max)
Analysis
Agent Harness
Antigravity CLI
Kimi Code CLI
Representative Model
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Kimi K3 (Max)
Coding Agent Index
59
41
Antigravity CLI has a higher Coding Agent Index than Kimi Code CLI
FrontierCode v1.1
51
43
Antigravity CLI has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than Kimi Code CLI
Terminal-Bench 4.0
64
21
Antigravity CLI has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Kimi Code CLI
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA
64
60
Antigravity CLI has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than Kimi Code CLI
Cost per Task
$7.74
$5.17
Kimi Code CLI has a lower cost per task than Antigravity CLI
Time per Task
29.8m
1.0h
Antigravity CLI has a lower time per task than Kimi Code CLI
Turns per Task
177.8
185.9
Antigravity CLI has a lower turns per task than Kimi Code CLI
Token Usage per Task
12.5M
9.01M
Kimi Code CLI has a lower token usage per task than Antigravity CLI
Cache Hit Rate
95%
96%
Kimi Code CLI has a higher cache hit rate than Antigravity CLI

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Antigravity CLI and Kimi Code CLI.

Model Variants

Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
high
59
51
64
64
$7.74
29.8m
12.5M
Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Argon (High)
high
53
49
56
55
$11.73
34.7m
13.9M
Kimi Code CLI
Kimi K3 (Max)
max
41
43
21
60
$5.17
1.0h
9.01M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by
Not publicly available

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by
Not publicly available

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by
Not publicly available

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant