Antigravity CLI vs. Grok Build

Comparison between Antigravity CLI and Grok Build across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better
No publicly available API
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
No publicly available API
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Antigravity CLI and Grok Build.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Grok Build
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Analysis
Agent Harness
Antigravity CLI
Grok Build
Representative Model
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Coding Agent Index
59
47
Antigravity CLI has a higher Coding Agent Index than Grok Build
FrontierCode v1.1
51
44
Antigravity CLI has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than Grok Build
Terminal-Bench 4.0
64
33
Antigravity CLI has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than Grok Build
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA
64
63
Antigravity CLI has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than Grok Build
Cost per Task
$7.74
$9.48
Antigravity CLI has a lower cost per task than Grok Build
Time per Task
29.8m
35.8m
Antigravity CLI has a lower time per task than Grok Build
Turns per Task
177.8
169.9
Grok Build has a lower turns per task than Antigravity CLI
Token Usage per Task
12.5M
15.9M
Antigravity CLI has a lower token usage per task than Grok Build
Cache Hit Rate
95%
94%
Antigravity CLI has a higher cache hit rate than Grok Build

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Antigravity CLI and Grok Build.

Model Variants

Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
high
59
51
64
64
$7.74
29.8m
12.5M
Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Argon (High)
high
53
49
56
55
$11.73
34.7m
13.9M
Grok Build
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
xhigh
47
44
33
63
$9.48
35.8m
15.9M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by
Not publicly available

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by
Not publicly available

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by
Not publicly available

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant