Antigravity CLI vs. DeepSeek Harness

Comparison between Antigravity CLI and DeepSeek Harness across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, including benchmark scores, cost, execution time, and token usage.

For details relating to our methodology, see our methodology page.

Explore other comparisons
vs
Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 · Higher is better
Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Average API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better

Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of Antigravity CLI and DeepSeek Harness.

Coding Agent Comparison

Metric
Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Argon
DeepSeek Harness
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Analysis
Agent Harness
Antigravity CLI
DeepSeek Harness
Representative Model
Gemini 4 Argon
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Coding Agent Index
53
46
Antigravity CLI has a higher Coding Agent Index than DeepSeek Harness
FrontierCode v1.1
49%
47%
Antigravity CLI has a higher FrontierCode v1.1 score than DeepSeek Harness
Terminal-Bench 4.0
56%
31%
Antigravity CLI has a higher Terminal-Bench 4.0 score than DeepSeek Harness
SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA
55%
62%
DeepSeek Harness has a higher SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA score than Antigravity CLI
Cost per Task
$5.86
$0.30
DeepSeek Harness has a lower cost per task than Antigravity CLI
Time per Task
34.7m
21.4m
DeepSeek Harness has a lower time per task than Antigravity CLI
Turns per Task
166.1
101.5
DeepSeek Harness has a lower turns per task than Antigravity CLI
Token Usage per Task
13.9M
16.7M
Antigravity CLI has a lower token usage per task than DeepSeek Harness
Cache Hit Rate
87%
97%
DeepSeek Harness has a higher cache hit rate than Antigravity CLI

Model Variants

Evaluated model variants for Antigravity CLI and DeepSeek Harness.

Model Variants

Antigravity CLI
Gemini 4 Argon
53
49%
56%
55%
$5.86
34.7m
13.9M
DeepSeek Harness
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
46
47%
31%
62%
$0.30
21.4m
16.7M

Performance

Performance across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index v2.0 incorporates 3 benchmarks: FrontierCode v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0, and SWE-Atlas-QnA-AA · Higher is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD)
Color by
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

Token Usage

Token consumption across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Token Usage per Task

Average input, cache, and output tokens per task
Prompt cache hit rates can vary significantly by provider routing, which can materially change effective cost.

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Total Tokens

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average total tokens per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant

Cost

Pay-per-token API cost across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, based on current per-token pricing.

Cost per Task

Average pay-per-token API cost per task (USD) · Lower is better
Color by

Execution Time

Active agent runtime across the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index.

Time per Task

Average agent wall time per task · Lower is better
Color by

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. Execution Time

Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index vs. average agent wall time per task
Color by
Most attractive quadrant