Thinking Machines:模型智能、性能与价格

Thinking Machines
Thinking Machines

本分析旨在帮助你根据使用场景,选择 Thinking Machines 提供的最佳模型。

最智能

#1
Inkling SmallInkling Small
26
#2
Inkling (xhigh)Inkling (xhigh)
25

Intelligence Index

共 2 个模型

速度最快

#1
Inkling SmallInkling Small
223 t/s
#2
Inkling (xhigh)Inkling (xhigh)
195 t/s

输出速度

共 2 个模型

价格最低

#1
Inkling SmallInkling Small
$0.22
#2
Inkling (xhigh)Inkling (xhigh)
$0.72

每 100 万 token 的混合价格

共 2 个模型

Thinking Machines 提供 2 个模型,每个模型的智能、性能和价格特征各不相同。 下方对比了各模型的关键指标。

  • 智能方面,Thinking Machines 上表现最好的模型是 Inkling Small(26)和Inkling (xhigh)(25)。
  • 输出速度方面,最快的模型是 Inkling Small(223 t/s)和Inkling (xhigh)(195 t/s)。
  • 延迟方面,Inkling Small(10.56 秒)和Inkling (xhigh)(12.02 秒) 的首个答案 Token 延迟最低。
  • 价格方面,Inkling Small($0.22)和Inkling (xhigh)($0.72) 每 100 万 token 的混合价格最低。
  • 上下文窗口方面,Inkling (xhigh)(262k)和Inkling Small(256k) 支持 Thinking Machines 上最大的上下文窗口。
  • Inkling Small 是 Thinking Machines 上综合表现最突出的模型,在智能、速度和价格三项指标中均排名第一。
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

智能评测

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Evaluations

Evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · AA-PersonalityBench scores are percentile ranks from 1 to 100
查看更多

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

Agentic SaaS workflows

Agentic real-world work tasks, Elo

Reasoning & knowledge

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

Agentic coding & terminal use

Long context reasoning

SciCodeUnder review

Coding

Physics reasoning

Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal

Agentic software engineering in open-source repositories

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

Legal agentic work, Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate

Agentic business operations

Agentic interactive 3D experiences, Elo

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

No data available
MLCR-AAUpdated

Medical long context reasoning

Visual reasoning

Rich, varied, well-crafted language

Well-structured, scannable, answer-first

Truthful, acknowledges uncertainty, non-sycophantic

Use of filler and generic language

Intelligence Index 与价格

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

上下文窗口

上下文窗口

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

价格

Intelligence Index 与价格

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

性能摘要

输出速度与价格

Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

速度

按输出速度(每秒 token 数)衡量

输出速度

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

延迟

按首 Token 延迟(秒)衡量

延迟: 首个答案 Token 延迟

收到首个回答 token 的秒数 · 包含推理模型的“思考”时间

缓存行为

缓存命中率

可缓存输入 token 中从缓存提供的比例 · 最近四周的中位数,更新于 2026年9月26日

每任务成本与缓存命中率

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Cache hit rate: median of the last four weeks, updated Sep 26, 2026
Most attractive quadrant

端到端响应时间

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

端到端响应时间与价格

End-to-end response time: end-to-end seconds to output 500 tokens · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

进一步分析
Thinking Machines 标志
Inkling Small
256k
开放
26
$0.09
223
1.58
12.80
8.97
Thinking Machines 标志
Inkling (xhigh)
262k
开放
25
--
195
1.79
14.58
10.23

关键定义

常见问题

关于 Thinking Machines 的常见问题