Thinking Machines:模型智能、性能与价格

Thinking Machines
Thinking Machines

本分析旨在帮助你根据使用场景,选择 Thinking Machines 提供的最佳模型。

最智能

#1
Inkling 2 SmallInkling 2 Small
31
#2
Inkling SmallInkling Small
13
#3
Inkling (xhigh)Inkling (xhigh)
12

Intelligence Index

共 3 个模型

每任务耗时最短

#1
Inkling SmallInkling Small
5.3 min
#2
Inkling (xhigh)Inkling (xhigh)
10.7 min
#3
Inkling 2 SmallInkling 2 Small
28.5 min

每个 Intelligence Index 任务耗时(分钟)

共 3 个模型

价格最低

#1
Inkling 2 SmallInkling 2 Small
$0.18
#2
Inkling SmallInkling Small
$0.22
#3
Inkling (xhigh)Inkling (xhigh)
$0.72

每 100 万 token 的混合价格

共 3 个模型

Thinking Machines 提供 3 个模型,每个模型的智能、性能和价格特征各不相同。 下方对比了各模型的关键指标。

  • 智能方面,Thinking Machines 上表现最好的模型是 Inkling 2 Small(31)、Inkling Small(13)和Inkling (xhigh)(12)。
  • 每任务耗时方面,Inkling Small(5.3 分钟)、Inkling (xhigh)(10.7 分钟)和Inkling 2 Small(28.5 分钟) 在 Thinking Machines 上完成一个 Intelligence Index 任务最快。
  • 延迟方面,Inkling Small(15.14 秒)、Inkling (xhigh)(21.00 秒)和Inkling 2 Small(68.69 秒) 的首个答案 Token 延迟最低。
  • 价格方面,Inkling 2 Small($0.18)、Inkling Small($0.22)和Inkling (xhigh)($0.72) 每 100 万 token 的混合价格最低。
  • 上下文窗口方面,Inkling 2 Small(262k)、Inkling (xhigh)(262k)和Inkling Small(256k) 支持 Thinking Machines 上最大的上下文窗口。
  • Inkling 2 Small 在智能与成本效益之间取得了最佳平衡。若追求最短的每任务耗时,Inkling Small 是首选。
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

智能

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode-AA 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

Evaluations

Evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · AA-PersonalityBench scores are percentile ranks from 1 to 100
查看更多

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

Agentic SaaS workflows

Agentic scientific research workflows in a terminal

Agentic software engineering in open-source repositories

Reasoning & knowledge

Professional document reasoning, All-pass

Agentic coding & terminal use

Physics reasoning

Quantitative analysis on spreadsheets & documents

Legal agentic work, Hallucination-Gated All-Pass Rate

Agentic business operations

Agentic real-world work tasks, Elo

Agentic interactive 3D experiences, Elo

Product and brand videos designed in code, Elo

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

No data available

Medical long context reasoning

Visual reasoning

Rich, varied, well-crafted language

Well-structured, scannable, answer-first

Truthful, acknowledges uncertainty, non-sycophantic

Use of filler and generic language

Intelligence Index 与价格

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

价格

每项 Intelligence Index 任务的成本

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

Intelligence Index 与价格

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant

速度

已测量的单次请求和多轮智能体工作负载的平均值

Intelligence Index 每项任务耗时

Output tokens divided by end-to-end output speed (minutes per Intelligence Index task) · Lower is better

质量

上下文窗口

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better

延迟

已测量的单次请求和多轮智能体工作负载的平均值

首个答案 Token 延迟

经过推理后首个答案 token 到达所需的秒数 · 已测量的单次请求和多轮智能体工作负载的平均值 · 越低越好

可靠性

在所有已测量的单次请求和多轮智能体工作负载中,接入点失败的请求占比

接入点错误率

接入点因错误、限速或超时而失败的请求占比 · 涵盖所有已测量的单次请求和多轮智能体工作负载 · 越低越好

缓存

缓存命中率

多轮智能体会话各次运行在最近四周的中位数,更新于 2026年10月26日 · 越高越好

每任务成本与缓存命中率

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Cache hit rate: median of the last four weeks, updated Oct 26, 2026
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

进一步分析
Thinking Machines 标志
Inkling 2 Small
31
$1.18
30.9
66.64
0.0%
262k
开放
Thinking Machines 标志
Inkling Small
13
$0.20
5.5
19.04
0.0%
256k
开放
Thinking Machines 标志
Inkling (xhigh)
12
$1.35
10.6
21.20
5.5%
262k
开放

关键定义

常见问题

关于 Thinking Machines 的常见问题