所有评测

AA-3D: Interactive 3D Experience Benchmark

A benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis for how well AI models build interactive 3D experiences. Models work as agents in an offline sandbox via Stirrup to turn a written brief into a three.js scene, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise votes.
查看示例任务

AA-3D

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)在 AA-3D 中得分最高,为 1199;其次是Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback),得分 1196和GPT-6 Astra (Max),得分 1164

AA-3D排行榜

范围
模型
Elo
11-2
Anthropic logo
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
1199±3395% 区间 1166 至 1231
21-3
Anthropic logo
Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback)
1196±3395% 区间 1164 至 1229
33-5
OpenAI logo
GPT-6 Astra (Max)
1164±3295% 区间 1132 至 1196
43-6
Google logo
Gemini 4 Argon (High)
1153±3395% 区间 1120 至 1186
53-8
Anthropic logo
Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback)
1135±3295% 区间 1103 至 1167
64-8
OpenAI logo
GPT-6 Sol (Max)
1121±3295% 区间 1089 至 1153
75-8
OpenAI logo
GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)
1119±3295% 区间 1088 至 1151
85-8
Kimi logo
Kimi K3.1 Pro
1110±3395% 区间 1078 至 1143
99
Meta logo
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
1033±3195% 区间 1003 至 1064
1010
OpenAI logo
GPT-6 Luna (Max)
1000锚点固定为 1000,作为本榜单 Elo 刻度的参照点。
1110-14
Anthropic logo
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)
998±3195% 区间 967 至 1028
1210-15
SpaceXAI logo
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
995±3195% 区间 964 至 1025
1310-15
Xiaomi logo
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
983±3195% 区间 952 至 1014
1410-15
Kimi logo
Kimi K3 (Max)
982±3195% 区间 951 至 1013
1512-17
Google logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)
966±3195% 区间 935 至 997
1615-17
Alibaba logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
945±3195% 区间 914 至 976
1715-17
Z AI logo
GLM-5.3-Flash
937±3195% 区间 906 至 967
1818-19
Mistral logo
Mistral Large 4 Preview
870±3195% 区间 839 至 901
1918-19
StepFun logo
Step 5 Preview
854±3295% 区间 821 至 886
2020
Z AI logo
GLM-5.3 (Max)
783±3495% 区间 749 至 817
2121
MiniMax logo
MiniMax-M3
740±3395% 区间 707 至 773
2222-23
Thinking Machines logo
Inkling (Xhigh)
583±4095% 区间 543 至 623
2322-23
NVIDIA logo
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B (Reasoning)
573±4395% 区间 529 至 616

AA-3D Elo

AA-3D Elo

Elo from blind pairwise votes, with 95% confidence intervals · Higher is better

AA-3D:Elo vs. 每项任务成本

AA-3D Elo vs. average cost per task (USD)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line

选择一个领域、一项任务和一个模型,即可加载该模型构建的场景。

任务

模型

Create an interactive adult man performing weightlifting exercises, with views that expose his muscles, skeleton and organs in anatomically accurate form.

正在加载场景

23 个模型中有 23 个在盲测投票中有此任务的场景。

Elo vs. Intelligence Index

AA-3D Elo vs. Intelligence Index

AA-3D Elo · Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Most attractive quadrant

各领域胜率

每个单元格显示模型在某个任务领域中赢得的投票占比,数据来自当前排行榜所依据的投票。按对手均衡的视图对模型在该领域中对每个对手的胜率取平均值,使每个对手的权重相同。

AA-3D 各领域胜率

在每个任务领域中赢得的评审面板投票占比 · 基于超过 1.2万 张评审面板投票

成本

AA-3D:每项任务成本

每项任务的平均成本(美元),按输入、缓存命中、缓存写入、推理和回答 Token 划分

Token 使用量

AA-3D:每项任务的输出 Token

运行一项任务使用的输出 Token,按推理和回答 Token 划分

每个场景轮次

AA-3D 每个场景轮次

Distribution of agent turns per scene, up to the limit of 250 · 5th percentile, 25th percentile, median, 75th percentile, 95th percentile · Lower is better

工具使用

AA-3D 每个场景工具调用次数

每个场景的平均工具调用次数,按调用用途分组

AA-3D 的运作方式

任务说明离线沙箱输出Kerr black hole交付规范时间0 分 / 3 小时轮次0 / 250模型code_execview_image自己的渲染图沙箱中的工具BlenderRapier 物理引擎Python无头浏览器CC0 资源库index.html在浏览器中运行的交互式场景

每个模型都在离线沙箱中作为智能体工作。它会收到一份针对一个交互式场景的书面任务说明,以及所有任务共用的交付规范。模型编写代码、渲染场景、查看自己的截图并加以修改。可用的工具包括 Blender、Rapier 物理引擎、Python、无头浏览器和 CC0 资源库。每次运行在 3 小时或 250 轮后停止。最终结果是一个在浏览器中运行该场景的 index.html 页面。

深入了解一次智能体运行

这些回放使用 AA-3D 发布时的数据。选择一项任务,即可在共享时钟上回放每个模型的运行。将鼠标悬停在某一行上可查看每个操作,点击该行可查看时间分配。

观看场景的构建过程

得分 vs. 发布日期

AA-3D:得分 vs. 发布日期

Most attractive region

常见问题

探索评测

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0

A composite benchmark aggregating nine challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across knowledge work, coding, science, and general knowledge.

AA-Briefcase v1.1: Agentic Knowledge Work BenchmarkAA-Briefcase v1.1: Agentic Knowledge Work Benchmark

A private evaluation developed by Artificial Analysis for frontier agentic capability in long-horizon knowledge work, testing agents on realistic business workflows that require deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and memos.

AA-3D: Interactive 3D Experience BenchmarkAA-3D: Interactive 3D Experience Benchmark

A benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis for how well AI models build interactive 3D experiences. Models work as agents in an offline sandbox via Stirrup to turn a written brief into a three.js scene, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise votes.

APEX-Agents-AA BenchmarkAPEX-Agents-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of the APEX-Agents benchmark, testing AI agents on long-horizon, cross-application tasks in professional-services environments with realistic application tooling.

AA-AnalystAgent BenchmarkAA-AnalystAgent Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' data analysis benchmark, testing AI agents on their ability to work with spreadsheets and documents to answer quantitative questions a Business Analyst or Data Analyst would face day-to-day.

AutomationBench-AA: Agentic SaaS Workflow BenchmarkAutomationBench-AA: Agentic SaaS Workflow Benchmark

A benchmark measuring agentic task completion across simulated SaaS application environments, scoring the share of each task's objectives completed without guardrail violations.

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 BenchmarkHarvey LAB-AA v1.1 Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), testing AI agents on real-world legal work from Harvey's dataset of 120 private tasks spanning 24 legal practice areas. v1.1, built in collaboration with Harvey, checks every deliverable against the task's source documents for hallucinations, so work that passes every rubric criterion but contains a material hallucination receives no credit. A panel of three judges grades each deliverable criterion-by-criterion.

GDP.pdf BenchmarkGDP.pdf Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Surge AI's GDP.pdf benchmark, testing whether language models can reason over long, real-world professional documents and satisfy detailed task-specific criteria.

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA BenchmarkEnterpriseOps-Gym-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' independent implementation of ServiceNow's EnterpriseOps-Gym, an agentic benchmark testing whether LLM agents can complete stateful, multi-step enterprise workflows across eight business domains via live tool use, graded on the final state of the underlying databases.

Terminal-Bench 4.0 BenchmarkTerminal-Bench 4.0 Benchmark

A harder 66-task benchmark of complex terminal work across software, machine learning, science, operations, security, hardware, and media, with recalibrated compute and time allowances and improved instructions, environments, and verifiers.

Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 BenchmarkTerminal-Bench-Science 0.1 Benchmark

A 70-task benchmark of research workflows authored and reviewed by domain experts across the life, physical, earth, mathematical, and engineering sciences, each completed in a terminal and checked by its own set of tests.

FrontierCode 2.0 BenchmarkFrontierCode 2.0 Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0, a private agentic coding benchmark of 132 tasks in real open-source repositories, graded on whether a maintainer would merge the agent's change.

HLE-Diamond BenchmarkHLE-Diamond Benchmark

A refined and updated 1,000-question set of Humanity's Last Exam, split evenly between reasoning and knowledge questions, with 272 questions that include an image.

AA-PersonalityBench: AI Personality & Communication Style BenchmarkAA-PersonalityBench: AI Personality & Communication Style Benchmark

Measures how models communicate rather than whether they are correct: 30 judged personality traits rolled up into 8 indexes, plus 21 measured communication characteristics.

AA-Omniscience v1.1: Knowledge and Hallucination BenchmarkAA-Omniscience v1.1: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark

A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.

GPQA Diamond Benchmark

The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.

ITBench-AA BenchmarkITBench-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of IBM's ITBench benchmark, testing AI agents on Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis from offline incident snapshots. The agent inspects alerts, events, traces, and topology and identifies the contributing-factor entities (deployments, pods, namespaces, network policies, etc.) responsible for the failure.

MMMU-Pro BenchmarkMMMU-Pro Benchmark

An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.

IFBench BenchmarkIFBench Benchmark

A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.

MLCR-AA: Medical Long Context Reasoning BenchmarkMLCR-AA: Medical Long Context Reasoning Benchmark

An open benchmark from Wisedocs measuring how well models reason over long, fragmented medical records, performing the multi-document synthesis claims professionals rely on when reviewing insurance and healthcare cases.

Code2Video-AA BenchmarkCode2Video-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of HeyGen's Code2Video Bench, evaluating how well models create short product and brand videos from 114 design briefs using HyperFrames HTML.

HealthBench BenchmarkHealthBench Benchmark

OpenAI's HealthBench: 5,000 health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics, from emergency referrals to global health.

CritPt v2 BenchmarkCritPt v2 Benchmark

CritPt v2 is the revised version of CritPt, a benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 70 composite research challenges. Models solve problems with a code-execution tool in an offline Linux sandbox.

GDPval-AA v2.1 BenchmarkGDPval-AA v2.1 Benchmark

GDPval-AA v2.1 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop via Stirrup to solve tasks, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.

𝜏³-Banking Benchmark𝜏³-Banking Benchmark

A fintech customer-support benchmark from the 𝜏-Knowledge framework that tests whether agents can navigate a large unstructured knowledge base and execute multi-step tool calls to resolve realistic banking workflows.

Terminal-Bench 2.1 BenchmarkTerminal-Bench 2.1 Benchmark

A verified refresh of Terminal-Bench 2.0: 89 curated tasks across software engineering, system administration, data processing, model training, and security, with environment and instruction fixes so scores reflect agent capability rather than environment gaps.

FrontierCode 1.1 BenchmarkFrontierCode 1.1 Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Cognition's FrontierCode 1.1, a private agentic coding benchmark that tests models on completing coding tasks in a way that would actually get merged by maintainers of real-world repositories.

AA-LCR v1.1: Long Context Reasoning BenchmarkAA-LCR v1.1: Long Context Reasoning Benchmark

A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).

SciCode BenchmarkSciCode Benchmark

A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 288 test set subproblems from 80 laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.

Humanity's Last Exam BenchmarkHumanity's Last Exam Benchmark

A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.

CritPt BenchmarkCritPt Benchmark

A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.

Terminal-Bench Hard BenchmarkTerminal-Bench Hard Benchmark

An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.

𝜏²-Bench Telecom Benchmark𝜏²-Bench Telecom Benchmark

A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.

MMLU-Pro BenchmarkMMLU-Pro Benchmark

An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.

LiveCodeBench BenchmarkLiveCodeBench Benchmark

A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.

MATH-500 BenchmarkMATH-500 Benchmark

A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.

AIME 2025 BenchmarkAIME 2025 Benchmark

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.

Global-MMLU-Lite BenchmarkGlobal-MMLU-Lite Benchmark

A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.