AA-PersonalityBench: AI Personality & Communication Style Benchmark
性格指数
每个指数取其特质 Elo z 分数的平均值,再在基准测试中所有已评估模型之间换算为 1 到 100 的百分位排名。
性格指数
特质如何构成性格指数
每个性格特质 30 个问题(共 900 个),由模型评审团评审。每个指数将其特质的 Elo 评分转换为 z 分数,必要时反向处理,计算平均值,再在基准测试中所有已评估模型之间将结果换算为 1 到 100 的百分位排名。
示例问题、回答与评分
What's the weirdest social norm we all just accept?
评分摘要
Both responses are funny, but Answer B sustains a much denser level of humor throughout. It leans into comedic reframing with vivid, absurd imagery: the birthday cake described as a 'high-calorie loaf of sugar that has been set on fire,' blowing out candles as an 'aerosolized lung-blast,' clapping as 'repeatedly slapping your own flesh together,' and lawn care existing to 'prove to our neighbors that we aren't feral.' Nearly every item is delivered as a punchline with playful exaggeration and an amused, observational tone. Answer A is genuinely witty too (e.g., 'Congratulations on surviving another year—here's your catering bill'), but its humor is more understated and it pivots to a dry, analytical conclusion about norm enforcement, making it comparatively restrained. Answer B expresses the humorous trait the most.
回答经过匿名处理:回答 A 来自 GLM-5.3 (Max),回答 B 来自 。Answer B delivers a rapid-fire series of witty, observational jokes (such as describing blowing out candles as spitting on a communal dessert, or handshakes as a secret society ritual). While Answer A has a clever closing line, Answer B maintains a playful, humorous tone throughout the entire response.
回答经过匿名处理:回答 A 来自 GPT-6.1 Sol (Max),回答 B 来自 MiMo-V2.6-Pro。性格特质详细结果
构成 8 个指数的全部 30 个评审特质。
Expressiveness 特质
性格特质排行榜
每个特质的 Elo 在基准测试中所有已评估模型之间换算为 1 到 100 的百分位排名。“总体”标签页显示指数:其特质 Elo z 分数的平均值,以同样方式换算为百分位排名。误差线以同一尺度显示每个模型的 95% 置信区间。
AA-PersonalityBench:Expressiveness 指数
比较模型性格
比较任意两个模型:每个条形显示根据二者 Elo 计算出的、一个模型的回答被判定为更能体现该特质的概率。
AA-PersonalityBench:Expressiveness 指数,Kimi K3 (max) vs GLM-5.3-Flash
自然形成的模型家族与聚类
根据评审特质和沟通特征的相似程度对模型分组,对 z 分数之间的相关性采用平均连接聚类。
自然形成的性格家族
构建你自己的性格排名
从 30 个特质中任意挑选,并为其分配 −2 到 +2 的权重。你所选特质的 Elo z 分数按加权平均合并,再在基准测试中所有已评估模型之间换算为 1 到 100 的百分位排名。
自定义加权性格排名
沟通特征
直接从每条回答中测量的 21 项指标,独立于上文评审的特质。单元格显示每条回答的平均值,并按其在基准测试中所有已评估模型之间的百分位排名着色。
沟通特征:长度
模型指纹
每个模型最强和最弱的信号,以高于 (+) 或低于 (−) 所有模型平均值的标准差 (σ) 表示。
模型指纹:性格特质
- Evidence-Based+2.1σ
- Information Dense+1.7σ
- Truthful+1.6σ
- Lexically Varied+1.3σ
- Literate+1.3σ
- Slop−1.0σ
- Sycophantic−0.3σ
- Bottom-Line Summary−0.2σ
- Truthful+1.5σ
- Admits Uncertainty+1.5σ
- Disclaims Assumptions+1.4σ
- Structured+1.3σ
- Open-Ended+1.1σ
- Resource-Specific−1.8σ
- Slop−1.2σ
- Metaphorical−1.0σ
- Information Dense−0.6σ
- Scannable−0.5σ
- Disclaims Assumptions+1.6σ
- Admits Uncertainty+1.5σ
- Truthful+1.4σ
- Structured+1.2σ
- Direct+1.2σ
- Resource-Specific−1.8σ
- Slop−1.2σ
- Metaphorical−1.1σ
- Information Dense−0.6σ
- Actionable Guidance−0.5σ
- Truthful+1.4σ
- Disclaims Assumptions+1.3σ
- Literate+1.3σ
- Direct+1.1σ
- Admits Uncertainty+1.1σ
- Resource-Specific−1.3σ
- Slop−1.0σ
- Metaphorical−0.9σ
- Friendly−0.5σ
- Scannable−0.5σ
- Friendly+1.9σ
- Emotionally Intelligent+1.6σ
- Actionable Guidance+1.5σ
- Pragmatic+1.4σ
- Evidence-Based+1.3σ
- Direct−0.8σ
- Literate−0.1σ
- Direct+1.7σ
- Sincere+1.2σ
- Answer First+1.1σ
- Literate+1.1σ
- Natural Sounding+0.8σ
- Sycophantic−1.8σ
- Slop−1.5σ
- Friendly−1.3σ
- Scannable−1.1σ
- Resource-Specific−1.0σ
- Bottom-Line Summary+1.4σ
- Admits Uncertainty+1.2σ
- Confident+1.1σ
- Flags Nuances+1.1σ
- Actionable Guidance+0.9σ
- Friendly−1.4σ
- Sycophantic−1.0σ
- Emotionally Intelligent−0.8σ
- Open-Ended−0.7σ
- Metaphorical−0.5σ
- Natural Sounding+1.9σ
- Lexically Varied+1.6σ
- Eloquent+1.6σ
- Sincere+1.5σ
- Constructive Pushback+1.4σ
- Actionable Guidance−1.0σ
- Sycophantic−0.7σ
- Slop−0.7σ
- Bottom-Line Summary−0.5σ
- Resource-Specific−0.5σ
- Scannable+1.6σ
- Open-Ended+1.1σ
- Admits Uncertainty+0.5σ
- Constructive Pushback+0.5σ
- Slop+0.4σ
- Answer First−1.5σ
- Opinionated−1.2σ
- Actionable Guidance−1.1σ
- Confident−1.0σ
- Sycophantic−1.0σ
探索评测
A composite benchmark aggregating nine challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across knowledge work, coding, science, and general knowledge.
A private evaluation developed by Artificial Analysis for frontier agentic capability in long-horizon knowledge work, testing agents on realistic business workflows that require deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and memos.
A benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis for how well AI models build interactive 3D experiences. Models work as agents in an offline sandbox via Stirrup to turn a written brief into a three.js scene, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise votes.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of the APEX-Agents benchmark, testing AI agents on long-horizon, cross-application tasks in professional-services environments with realistic application tooling.
Artificial Analysis' data analysis benchmark, testing AI agents on their ability to work with spreadsheets and documents to answer quantitative questions a Business Analyst or Data Analyst would face day-to-day.
A benchmark measuring agentic task completion across simulated SaaS application environments, scoring the share of each task's objectives completed without guardrail violations.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), testing AI agents on real-world legal work from Harvey's dataset of 120 private tasks spanning 24 legal practice areas. v1.1, built in collaboration with Harvey, checks every deliverable against the task's source documents for hallucinations, so work that passes every rubric criterion but contains a material hallucination receives no credit. A panel of three judges grades each deliverable criterion-by-criterion.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Surge AI's GDP.pdf benchmark, testing whether language models can reason over long, real-world professional documents and satisfy detailed task-specific criteria.
Artificial Analysis' independent implementation of ServiceNow's EnterpriseOps-Gym, an agentic benchmark testing whether LLM agents can complete stateful, multi-step enterprise workflows across eight business domains via live tool use, graded on the final state of the underlying databases.
A harder 66-task benchmark of complex terminal work across software, machine learning, science, operations, security, hardware, and media, with recalibrated compute and time allowances and improved instructions, environments, and verifiers.
A 70-task benchmark of research workflows authored and reviewed by domain experts across the life, physical, earth, mathematical, and engineering sciences, each completed in a terminal and checked by its own set of tests.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0, a private agentic coding benchmark of 132 tasks in real open-source repositories, graded on whether a maintainer would merge the agent's change.
A refined and updated 1,000-question set of Humanity's Last Exam, split evenly between reasoning and knowledge questions, with 272 questions that include an image.
Measures how models communicate rather than whether they are correct: 30 judged personality traits rolled up into 8 indexes, plus 21 measured communication characteristics.
A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.
The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of IBM's ITBench benchmark, testing AI agents on Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis from offline incident snapshots. The agent inspects alerts, events, traces, and topology and identifies the contributing-factor entities (deployments, pods, namespaces, network policies, etc.) responsible for the failure.
An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.
A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.
An open benchmark from Wisedocs measuring how well models reason over long, fragmented medical records, performing the multi-document synthesis claims professionals rely on when reviewing insurance and healthcare cases.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of HeyGen's Code2Video Bench, evaluating how well models create short product and brand videos from 114 design briefs using HyperFrames HTML.
OpenAI's HealthBench: 5,000 health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics, from emergency referrals to global health.
CritPt v2 is the revised version of CritPt, a benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 70 composite research challenges. Models solve problems with a code-execution tool in an offline Linux sandbox.
VIALS-AA is Artificial Analysis' implementation of Handshake AI's VIALS benchmark. It tests whether language models can interpret scientific images and answer questions about the evidence they contain.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Google DeepMind's Multimodal Knowledge Agent (MKA) benchmark. It tests whether agents can read visually dense project files, such as architectural drawings, engineering schematics and clinical scans, and produce the deliverables a professional would.
GDPval-AA v2.1 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop via Stirrup to solve tasks, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.
A fintech customer-support benchmark from the 𝜏-Knowledge framework that tests whether agents can navigate a large unstructured knowledge base and execute multi-step tool calls to resolve realistic banking workflows.
A verified refresh of Terminal-Bench 2.0: 89 curated tasks across software engineering, system administration, data processing, model training, and security, with environment and instruction fixes so scores reflect agent capability rather than environment gaps.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Cognition's FrontierCode 1.1, a private agentic coding benchmark that tests models on completing coding tasks in a way that would actually get merged by maintainers of real-world repositories.
A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).
A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 288 test set subproblems from 80 laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.
A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.
A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.
An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.
A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.
An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.
A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.
A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.
A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.