量表
每项检查按通过或未通过二元评分
模型是否遵循任务指示、识别散落在源文件中的要求、使用正确证据并得出正确结论?
AA-Briefcase 通过四个持续数周的知识工作项目评测模型,共包含数千个输入文件和 91 项任务。在不同场景中,模型必须完成数据科学、产品管理和企业战略等领域的真实专业工作流程。每个场景都是智能体依次推进的多周工作流程,每周包含多项任务。每项任务都需要生成成果,并依据检查项量表进行评分。虽然同一场景中的任务会跨周共享文件和上下文,但模型目前会独立运行每项任务,不会沿用自己先前的提交结果。
每项任务按三类检查进行评分:
每项检查按通过或未通过二元评分
模型是否遵循任务指示、识别散落在源文件中的要求、使用正确证据并得出正确结论?
两两比较
与另一模型的提交结果相比,哪份成果更全面、分析更严谨、论据更充分?
两两比较
与另一模型的提交结果相比,哪一份呈现得更专业?
我们已通过 Hugging Face 发布第五个公开场景,用于展示场景结构、提交和评分方式。该场景仅供演示,不计入 AA-Briefcase 官方结果。
按交付物文件类型(Excel、PowerPoint、PDF、Word、其他)划分的 AA-Briefcase 表现。
各智能体在 AA-Briefcase 中的工具调用情况:按工具类别统计的调用次数、每轮平均工具调用次数以及来源库探索覆盖率。
开发者 | 名称 | Elo | 置信区间 | 发布日期 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | 1824 | -12 / +13 | 2026年9月 | |
| 2 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) | 1808 | -13 / +12 | 2026年9月 | |
| 3 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | 1768 | -11 / +11 | 2026年9月 | |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | 1751 | -14 / +13 | 2026年9月 | |
| 5 | Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | 1690 | -10 / +10 | 2026年9月 | |
| 6 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) | 1676 | -10 / +10 | 2026年9月 | |
| 7 | Claude Opus 5 (Max) | 1662 | -8 / +9 | 2026年7月 | |
| 8 | Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) | 1657 | -8 / +9 | 2026年9月 | |
| 9 | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | 1645 | -10 / +11 | 2026年9月 | |
| 10 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) | 1640 | -9 / +11 | 2026年9月 | |
| 11 | Claude Opus 5 (Xhigh) | 1636 | -8 / +9 | 2026年7月 | |
| 12 | Grok 4.7 (High) | 1633 | -10 / +11 | 2026年9月 | |
| 13 | Claude Opus 5.5 (Medium, Default Fallback) | 1628 | -10 / +11 | 2026年9月 | |
| 14 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 1621 | -10 / +10 | 2026年9月 | |
| 15 | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | 1583 | -9 / +10 | 2026年9月 |
A composite benchmark aggregating ten challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across mathematics, science, coding, and reasoning.
A composite measure providing an industry standard to communicate model openness for users and developers.
A private evaluation developed by Artificial Analysis for frontier agentic capability in long-horizon knowledge work, testing agents on realistic business workflows that require deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and memos.
GDPval-AA v2.1 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop via Stirrup to solve tasks, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of the APEX-Agents benchmark, testing AI agents on long-horizon, cross-application tasks in professional-services environments with realistic application tooling.
Artificial Analysis' data analysis benchmark, testing AI agents on their ability to work with spreadsheets and documents to answer quantitative questions a Business Analyst or Data Analyst would face day-to-day.
A benchmark measuring agentic task completion across simulated SaaS application environments, scoring the share of each task's objectives completed without guardrail violations.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), testing AI agents on real-world legal work from Harvey's dataset of 120 private tasks spanning 24 legal practice areas. The agent reads case documents in a sandbox and produces legal deliverables (e.g., memos, disclosure schedules, deposition summaries), graded criterion-by-criterion by a single LLM rubric judge.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of Surge AI's GDP.pdf benchmark, testing whether language models can reason over long, real-world professional documents and satisfy detailed task-specific criteria.
Artificial Analysis' independent implementation of ServiceNow's EnterpriseOps-Gym, an agentic benchmark testing whether LLM agents can complete stateful, multi-step enterprise workflows across eight business domains via live tool use, graded on the final state of the underlying databases.
A harder 66-task benchmark of complex terminal work across software, machine learning, science, operations, security, hardware, and media, with recalibrated compute and time allowances and improved instructions, environments, and verifiers.
A 70-task benchmark of research workflows authored and reviewed by domain experts across the life, physical, earth, mathematical, and engineering sciences, each completed in a terminal and checked by its own set of tests.
A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).
A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.
A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 288 test set subproblems from 80 laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.
A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.
A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.
The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.
Artificial Analysis' implementation of IBM's ITBench benchmark, testing AI agents on Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis from offline incident snapshots. The agent inspects alerts, events, traces, and topology and identifies the contributing-factor entities (deployments, pods, namespaces, network policies, etc.) responsible for the failure.
An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.
A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.
An open benchmark from Wisedocs measuring how well models reason over long, fragmented medical records, performing the multi-document synthesis claims professionals rely on when reviewing insurance and healthcare cases.
A fintech customer-support benchmark from the 𝜏-Knowledge framework that tests whether agents can navigate a large unstructured knowledge base and execute multi-step tool calls to resolve realistic banking workflows.
A verified refresh of Terminal-Bench 2.0 — 89 curated tasks across software engineering, system administration, data processing, model training, and security, with environment and instruction fixes so scores reflect agent capability rather than environment gaps.
An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.
A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.
An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.
A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.
A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.
A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.