SiliconFlow:模型智能、性能与价格

SiliconFlow
SiliconFlow

分析 SiliconFlow 各模型的关键指标,包括质量、价格、输出速度、延迟、上下文窗口等。 本分析旨在帮助你根据使用场景,选择 SiliconFlow 提供的最佳模型。

最智能

#1
GLM-5.2 (max) (FP8)
GLM-5.2 (max) (FP8)
51
#2
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)
50
#3
MiniMax-M3 (FP8)
MiniMax-M3 (FP8)
44
#4
DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) (FP8)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) (FP8)
44
#5
Kimi K2.6 (FP8)
Kimi K2.6 (FP8)
44

Intelligence Index

共 36 个模型

速度最快

#1
Nex-N2-Pro (FP8)
Nex-N2-Pro (FP8)
131 t/s
#2
Gemma 4 12B
Gemma 4 12B
111 t/s
#3
Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)
Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)
108 t/s
#4
Gemma 4 26B A4B (FP8)
Gemma 4 26B A4B (FP8)
106 t/s
#5
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)
105 t/s

输出速度

共 36 个模型

价格最低

#1
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)
$0.07
#2
DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) (FP8)
DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) (FP8)
$0.07
#3
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) (FP8)
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) (FP8)
$0.07
#4
Hy3 (FP8)
Hy3 (FP8)
$0.10
#5
Qwen3.5 9B (FP8)
Qwen3.5 9B (FP8)
$0.11

每 100 万 token 的混合价格

共 36 个模型

表示推理模型

SiliconFlow 提供 36 个模型,每个模型的智能、性能和价格特征各不相同。 下方对比了各模型的关键指标。

  • 智能方面,SiliconFlow 上表现最好的模型是 GLM-5.2 (max) (FP8)(51)、DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)(50)和MiniMax-M3 (FP8)(44)。
  • 输出速度方面,最快的模型是 Nex-N2-Pro (FP8)(131 t/s)、Gemma 4 12B(111 t/s)和Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)(108 t/s)。
  • 延迟方面,GLM-5.2 (FP8)(1.30 秒)、GLM-5.1 (FP8)(1.48 秒)和Kimi K2.6 (FP8)(1.74 秒) 的首个答案 Token 延迟最低。
  • 价格方面,DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)($0.07)、DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) (FP8)($0.07)和DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) (FP8)($0.07) 每 100 万 token 的混合价格最低。
  • 上下文窗口方面,GLM-5.2 (max) (FP8)(1M)、DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) (FP8)(1M)和DeepSeek V4 Pro (high) (FP8)(1M) 支持 SiliconFlow 上最大的上下文窗口。

亮点

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
USD per 1M tokens (blended) · Lower is better

智能评测

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Evaluations

Intelligence evaluations measured independently by Artificial Analysis · Higher is better

Agentic real-world work tasks, (Elo-500)/2000

Agentic tool use

Agentic coding & terminal use

Coding

Reasoning & knowledge

Scientific reasoning

Physics reasoning

Long context reasoning

Agentic knowledge work, Elo

Agentic SaaS workflows

Legal agentic work, criterion pass rate

Agentic business operations

Instruction following

Long-horizon agentic tasks

Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis

Visual reasoning

Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While model intelligence generally translates across use cases, specific evaluations may be more relevant for certain use cases.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 includes: GDPval-AA v2, 𝜏³-Banking, Terminal-Bench v2.1, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GPQA Diamond, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While higher intelligence models are typically more expensive, they do not all follow the same price-quality curve.

上下文窗口

Context Window

Context window: tokens limit · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Larger context windows are relevant to RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) LLM workflows which typically involve reasoning and information retrieval of large amounts of data.

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

价格

Intelligence Index vs. Price

Blended at 7:2:1 (cache-input-output) · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

While higher intelligence models are typically more expensive, they do not all follow the same price-quality curve.

性能摘要

Output Speed vs. Price

Output speed: output tokens per second · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Price per token, shown in USD per million tokens. Price is a blend of cache hit, input, and output token prices using the selected ratio (default 7:2:1 cache-input-output).

速度

按输出速度(每秒 token 数)衡量

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API (e.g. OpenAI for o1) or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available (e.g. Meta's Llama models).

延迟

按首 Token 延迟(秒)衡量

Latency: Time To First Answer Token

Seconds to first answer token received · Accounts for reasoning model 'thinking' time
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Time to first answer token received, in seconds, after API request sent. For reasoning models, this includes the 'thinking' time of the model before providing an answer. For models which do not support streaming, this represents time to receive the completion.

端到端响应时间

Seconds to output 500 tokens, calculated based on time to first token, 'thinking' time for reasoning models, and output speed

End-to-End Response Time vs. Price

End-to-end response time: end-to-end seconds to output 500 tokens · USD per 1M tokens (blended)
Most attractive quadrant
Pareto line
Reasoning models are indicated by a lightbulb icon

Price per token, shown in USD per million tokens. Price is a blend of cache hit, input, and output token prices using the selected ratio (default 7:2:1 cache-input-output).

进一步分析
Z AI 标志
GLM-5.2 (max) (FP8)
1.05M
开放
51
$0.62
53
1.66
48.95
37.83
DeepSeek 标志
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)
1.05M
开放
50
$0.09
105
1.49
25.35
19.09
MiniMax 标志
MiniMax-M3 (FP8)
1M
开放
44
$0.12
84
1.66
31.34
23.74
DeepSeek 标志
DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) (FP8)
1.05M
开放
44
$0.31
54
1.72
91.26
80.36
Kimi 标志
Kimi K2.6 (FP8)
262k
开放
44
$0.32
47
1.62
106.51
94.30
DeepSeek 标志
DeepSeek V4 Pro (high) (FP8)
1.05M
开放
43
$0.29
52
1.83
49.61
38.20
Tencent 标志
Hy3 (FP8)
256k
开放
41
$0.03
70
2.77
38.50
28.58
Nex AGI 标志
Nex-N2-Pro (FP8)
262k
开放
41
--
131
1.60
20.68
15.27
DeepSeek 标志
DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) (FP8)
1.05M
开放
40
$0.07
73
1.79
85.43
76.80
Z AI 标志
GLM-5.1 (FP8)
205k
开放
40
$0.39
65
1.64
68.07
58.69
Z AI 标志
GLM-5 (FP8)
200k
开放
40*
--
--
--
--
--
DeepSeek 标志
DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) (FP8)
1.05M
开放
37
$0.05
89
1.61
21.08
13.88
Alibaba 标志
Qwen3.6 27B (FP8)
262k
开放
37
$0.19
42
3.54
151.25
135.75
Kimi 标志
Kimi K2.5 (FP8)
262k
开放
35
$0.07
48
1.58
73.60
61.64
Z AI 标志
GLM-5.1 (FP8)
205k
开放
35*
--
57
1.48
10.25
--
Kimi 标志
Kimi K2.6 (FP8)
262k
开放
35*
--
43
1.74
13.40
--
Z AI 标志
GLM-5.2 (FP8)
1.05M
开放
34
--
59
1.30
9.75
--
Alibaba 标志
Qwen3.5 27B (FP8)
262k
开放
34*
--
34
3.59
76.60
58.41
Alibaba 标志
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (FP8)
262k
开放
34
$0.23
103
2.08
37.93
30.99
MiniMax 标志
MiniMax-M2.5 (FP8)
197k
开放
34*
--
42
2.34
61.72
47.51
LongCat 标志
LongCat 2.0 (FP8)
1M
开放
33
$0.12
42
2.74
61.75
47.21
Z AI 标志
GLM-5 (FP8)
205k
开放
32*
--
--
--
--
--
Alibaba 标志
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (FP8)
262k
开放
32
$0.17
52
1.89
50.23
38.67
DeepSeek 标志
DeepSeek V3.2 (FP8)
164k
开放
32
--
36
2.79
72.28
55.59
Alibaba 标志
Qwen3.6 35B A3B (FP8)
262k
开放
32
$0.17
72
2.15
84.33
75.21
Google 标志
Gemma 4 31B (FP8)
262k
开放
29
$0.03
51
3.76
47.77
34.17
Alibaba 标志
Qwen3.5 35B A3B (FP8)
262k
开放
29*
--
70
2.14
37.62
28.38
StepFun 标志
Step 3.5 Flash (FP8)
262k
开放
26*
--
67
1.84
39.33
29.99
DeepSeek 标志
DeepSeek V3.2 (FP8)
164k
开放
25*
--
35
2.86
17.12
--
Google 标志
Gemma 4 12B
262k
开放
22
$0.08
111
2.39
24.86
17.97
Google 标志
Gemma 4 31B (FP8)
262k
开放
22
$0.03
56
2.85
11.83
--
Alibaba 标志
Qwen3.5 9B (FP8)
262k
开放
21
$0.18
48
2.39
54.01
41.29
Google 标志
Gemma 4 26B A4B (FP8)
262k
开放
20*
--
106
2.13
6.86
--
ByteDance Seed 标志
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
262k
开放
18*
--
35
3.03
73.61
56.46
Z AI 标志
GLM-4.6V
128k
开放
17*
--
--
--
--
--
Z AI 标志
GLM-4.5-Air
98.3k
开放
17*
--
88
2.58
31.00
22.74
Google 标志
Gemma 4 12B (Non-reasoning)
262k
开放
13*
--
108
2.38
7.01
--
Z AI 标志
GLM-4.6V
128k
开放
11*
--
--
--
--
--
InclusionAI 标志
Ling-flash-2.0
131k
开放
10*
--
69
1.90
9.18
--
Alibaba 标志
Qwen2.5 72B (FP8)
32k
开放
10*
--
22
4.36
26.96
--
Baidu 标志
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
131k
开放
9*
--
--
--
--
--
InclusionAI 标志
Ring-flash-2.0
131k
开放
8*
--
--
--
--
--

关键定义

Maximum number of combined input & output tokens. Output tokens commonly have a significantly lower limit (varied by model).

常见问题

关于 SiliconFlow 的常见问题

SiliconFlow 上最智能的模型是 GLM-5.2 (max) (FP8),Intelligence Index 得分为 51。

按输出速度计算,SiliconFlow 上最快的模型是 Nex-N2-Pro (FP8),速度为每秒 131.0 个 token。

SiliconFlow 上首个答案 Token 延迟最低的模型是 GLM-5.2 (FP8),延迟为 1.30 秒。延迟越低,初始响应越快。

按混合价格计算,SiliconFlow 上最实惠的模型是 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max),每 100 万 token 的价格为 $0.07(缓存命中/输入/输出比例为 7:2:1)。

SiliconFlow 上各模型价格最多相差 14 倍,从最实惠的 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max)(每 100 万 token $0.07)到最昂贵的 GLM-5.1 (FP8)(每 100 万 token $1.03)。

是,SiliconFlow 提供兼容 OpenAI 的 API,可以轻松从 OpenAI 切换,或继续使用现有的 OpenAI SDK 集成。

SiliconFlow 上 36 个模型中,有 27 个支持用于结构化输出的 JSON 模式。

是,SiliconFlow 上全部 36 个模型均支持函数调用(工具使用)。

是,SiliconFlow 上全部 36 个模型均为开放权重模型。

会。服务商性能可能因基础设施变化、负载均衡和更新而随时间波动。我们持续对所有服务商进行基准测试,并在“随时间变化”图表中展示历史性能趋势。

选择 SiliconFlow 上的模型时,请考虑:智能(适合质量敏感型任务)、输出速度(适合吞吐量密集型任务)、延迟(适合需要快速首次响应的交互式应用)、价格(适合成本敏感型工作负载),以及上下文窗口大小、JSON 模式或函数调用支持等功能。