所有指数

Artificial Analysis Openness Index

A composite measure providing an industry standard to communicate model openness for users and developers.
查看示例任务

Openness Index

K2 Think V2在 Openness Index 中得分最高,为 89;其次是K2-V2 (High),得分 89和K2-V2 (Medium),得分 89

Openness Index

Gemini 3 Pro Preview (High)在 Openness Index 中得分最低,为 6;其次是GPT-5 Codex (High),得分 6和GPT-5.1 (High),得分 6

Openness Index

Artificial Analysis Openness Index:得分

Openness Index 以 0 至 100 的标准化评分衡量模型的开放程度(分数越高,越开放)

指数组成

Artificial Analysis Openness Index:组成部分

各组成部分对 Openness Index 的贡献,最高 18 分(分数越高,越开放)

透明度与可用性

Artificial Analysis Openness Index:模型可用性与透明度

模型可用性反映模型的使用途径及其许可(最高 6 分) · 模型透明度反映方法、数据披露与共享,以及训练过程相关的代码和许可(最高 12 分)
Most attractive quadrant

Openness Index 与发布日期

Artificial Analysis Openness Index:得分与发布日期

Artificial Analysis Openness Index · 发布日期
Most attractive region

开放性与智能水平

Artificial Analysis Openness Index 与 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Most attractive quadrant

Openness Index 的构成

详细评估方法
1. 模型可用性
权重
访问
0封闭权重,无 API
1封闭权重,API 限制 token 可见性
2封闭权重,API 可用
3开放权重
许可证
0封闭权重或不可商用
1可商用,需署名
2可商用,无需署名
3可商用,无需署名,无实质性限制
2. 模型透明度
数据:预训练与后训练(得分为各项的平均值)
访问
0未披露或有限披露
1部分数据来源详情及分类已披露
2完整数据配比已披露,大量数据已共享¹
3全部数据已共享
许可证(最严格的)
0不可商用/无大量数据共享
1可商用,需署名
2可商用,无需署名
3可商用,无需署名,无实质性限制
方法论
披露
0未披露或有限披露
1模型架构已披露
2有限的通用技术披露
3完整技术细节已披露
许可证(最严格的)
0未披露或发布任何代码
1框架已披露,可公开商用
2端到端训练流程代码或指南已发布
3端到端训练流程代码或指南已发布,且允许商用

评分方法

每个组成部分根据最符合的开放性类别,按0 至 3 分的定性标准评分。评估依据是所有公开的一手信息。

我们将这些因素综合为统一指标:Artificial Analysis Openness Index。计算方式如下:

  • 对预训练和后训练的数据项目取平均值(数据部分共 6 分)
  • 将所有组成部分的得分相加(最高 18/18 分)
  • 将得分归一化到 0 至 100 分

如果模型基于第三方基础模型,其评分可能受到上游模型许可或信息披露范围的限制。对于增量版本或更新版本,我们只考虑明确针对新版本披露的信息(模型开发者可说明哪些部分与早期版本保持一致)。

Openness Index 排行榜

开发者
模型
Openness Index
Intelligence Index
模型可用性
模型透明度
预训练数据访问
预训练数据许可
后训练数据访问
后训练数据许可
1
Institute of Foundation Models logoInstitute of Foundation Models
K2 Think V288.8911.506.0010.003.001.003.001.00
2
Institute of Foundation Models logoInstitute of Foundation Models
K2-V2 (High)88.899.876.0010.003.001.003.001.00
3
Institute of Foundation Models logoInstitute of Foundation Models
K2-V2 (Medium)88.899.026.0010.003.001.003.001.00
4
Institute of Foundation Models logoInstitute of Foundation Models
K2-V2 (Low)88.897.316.0010.003.001.003.001.00
5
Allen Institute for AI logoAllen Institute for AI
Olmo 3.1 32B Think88.897.126.0010.003.001.003.001.00
6
Allen Institute for AI logoAllen Institute for AI
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct88.896.506.0010.003.001.003.001.00
7
Allen Institute for AI logoAllen Institute for AI
Olmo 3 32B Think88.896.476.0010.003.001.003.001.00
8
Allen Institute for AI logoAllen Institute for AI
OLMo 2 32B88.895.976.0010.003.001.003.001.00
9
Allen Institute for AI logoAllen Institute for AI
Olmo 3 7B Think88.895.626.0010.003.001.003.001.00
10
Allen Institute for AI logoAllen Institute for AI
OLMo 2 7B88.895.586.0010.003.001.003.001.00
11
Allen Institute for AI logoAllen Institute for AI
Molmo 7B-D88.895.566.0010.003.001.003.001.00
12
Allen Institute for AI logoAllen Institute for AI
Olmo 3 7B Instruct88.895.246.0010.003.001.003.001.00
13
Swiss AI Initiative logoSwiss AI Initiative
Apertus 70B Instruct88.895.116.0010.003.001.003.001.00
14
Swiss AI Initiative logoSwiss AI Initiative
Apertus 8B Instruct88.894.836.0010.003.001.003.001.00
15
NVIDIA logoNVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL83.3326.496.009.002.001.002.001.00

常见问题

探索评测

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2

A composite benchmark aggregating ten challenging evaluations to provide a holistic measure of AI capabilities across mathematics, science, coding, and reasoning.

AA-Briefcase v1.1: Agentic Knowledge Work BenchmarkAA-Briefcase v1.1: Agentic Knowledge Work Benchmark

A private evaluation developed by Artificial Analysis for frontier agentic capability in long-horizon knowledge work, testing agents on realistic business workflows that require deliverables such as spreadsheets, presentations, and memos.

GDPval-AA v2.1 BenchmarkGDPval-AA v2.1 Benchmark

GDPval-AA v2.1 is Artificial Analysis' evaluation framework for OpenAI's GDPval dataset. It tests AI models on real-world tasks across 44 occupations and 9 major industries. Models are given shell access and web browsing capabilities in an agentic loop via Stirrup to solve tasks, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise comparisons.

AA-3D: Interactive 3D Experience BenchmarkAA-3D: Interactive 3D Experience Benchmark

A benchmark developed by Artificial Analysis for how well AI models build interactive 3D experiences. Models work as agents in an offline sandbox via Stirrup to turn a written brief into a three.js scene, with Elo ratings derived from blind pairwise votes.

APEX-Agents-AA BenchmarkAPEX-Agents-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of the APEX-Agents benchmark, testing AI agents on long-horizon, cross-application tasks in professional-services environments with realistic application tooling.

AA-AnalystAgent BenchmarkAA-AnalystAgent Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' data analysis benchmark, testing AI agents on their ability to work with spreadsheets and documents to answer quantitative questions a Business Analyst or Data Analyst would face day-to-day.

AutomationBench-AA: Agentic SaaS Workflow BenchmarkAutomationBench-AA: Agentic SaaS Workflow Benchmark

A benchmark measuring agentic task completion across simulated SaaS application environments, scoring the share of each task's objectives completed without guardrail violations.

Harvey LAB-AA v1.1 BenchmarkHarvey LAB-AA v1.1 Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), testing AI agents on real-world legal work from Harvey's dataset of 120 private tasks spanning 24 legal practice areas. v1.1, built in collaboration with Harvey, checks every deliverable against the task's source documents for hallucinations, so work that passes every rubric criterion but contains a material hallucination receives no credit. A panel of three judges grades each deliverable criterion-by-criterion.

GDP.pdf BenchmarkGDP.pdf Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Surge AI's GDP.pdf benchmark, testing whether language models can reason over long, real-world professional documents and satisfy detailed task-specific criteria.

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA BenchmarkEnterpriseOps-Gym-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' independent implementation of ServiceNow's EnterpriseOps-Gym, an agentic benchmark testing whether LLM agents can complete stateful, multi-step enterprise workflows across eight business domains via live tool use, graded on the final state of the underlying databases.

Terminal-Bench 4.0 BenchmarkTerminal-Bench 4.0 Benchmark

A harder 66-task benchmark of complex terminal work across software, machine learning, science, operations, security, hardware, and media, with recalibrated compute and time allowances and improved instructions, environments, and verifiers.

Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 BenchmarkTerminal-Bench-Science 0.1 Benchmark

A 70-task benchmark of research workflows authored and reviewed by domain experts across the life, physical, earth, mathematical, and engineering sciences, each completed in a terminal and checked by its own set of tests.

FrontierCode 1.1 BenchmarkFrontierCode 1.1 Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of Cognition's FrontierCode 1.1, a private agentic coding benchmark that tests models on completing coding tasks in a way that would actually get merged by maintainers of real-world repositories.

AA-PersonalityBench: AI Personality & Communication Style BenchmarkAA-PersonalityBench: AI Personality & Communication Style Benchmark

Measures how models communicate rather than whether they are correct: 30 judged personality traits rolled up into 8 indexes, plus 21 measured communication characteristics.

AA-LCR v1.1: Long Context Reasoning BenchmarkAA-LCR v1.1: Long Context Reasoning Benchmark

A challenging benchmark measuring language models' ability to extract, reason about, and synthesize information from long-form documents ranging from 10k to 100k tokens (measured using the cl100k_base tokenizer).

AA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination BenchmarkAA-Omniscience: Knowledge and Hallucination Benchmark

A benchmark measuring factual recall and hallucination across various economically relevant domains.

SciCode BenchmarkSciCode Benchmark

A scientist-curated coding benchmark featuring 288 test set subproblems from 80 laboratory problems across 16 scientific disciplines.

Humanity's Last Exam BenchmarkHumanity's Last Exam Benchmark

A frontier-level benchmark with 2,500 expert-vetted questions across mathematics, sciences, and humanities, designed to be the final closed-ended academic evaluation.

CritPt BenchmarkCritPt Benchmark

A benchmark designed to test LLMs on research-level physics reasoning tasks, featuring 71 composite research challenges.

GPQA Diamond Benchmark

The most challenging 198 questions from GPQA, where PhD experts achieve 65% accuracy but skilled non-experts only reach 34% despite web access.

ITBench-AA BenchmarkITBench-AA Benchmark

Artificial Analysis' implementation of IBM's ITBench benchmark, testing AI agents on Kubernetes incident root-cause analysis from offline incident snapshots. The agent inspects alerts, events, traces, and topology and identifies the contributing-factor entities (deployments, pods, namespaces, network policies, etc.) responsible for the failure.

MMMU-Pro BenchmarkMMMU-Pro Benchmark

An enhanced MMMU benchmark that eliminates shortcuts and guessing strategies to more rigorously test multimodal models across 30 academic disciplines.

IFBench BenchmarkIFBench Benchmark

A benchmark evaluating precise instruction-following generalization on 58 diverse, verifiable out-of-domain constraints that test models' ability to follow specific output requirements.

MLCR-AA: Medical Long Context Reasoning BenchmarkMLCR-AA: Medical Long Context Reasoning Benchmark

An open benchmark from Wisedocs measuring how well models reason over long, fragmented medical records, performing the multi-document synthesis claims professionals rely on when reviewing insurance and healthcare cases.

HealthBench BenchmarkHealthBench Benchmark

OpenAI's HealthBench: 5,000 health conversations graded against physician-written rubrics, from emergency referrals to global health.

HealthBench Professional BenchmarkHealthBench Professional Benchmark

OpenAI's HealthBench Professional: 525 clinician conversations covering consult, writing and research tasks, graded against physician-written rubrics.

𝜏³-Banking Benchmark𝜏³-Banking Benchmark

A fintech customer-support benchmark from the 𝜏-Knowledge framework that tests whether agents can navigate a large unstructured knowledge base and execute multi-step tool calls to resolve realistic banking workflows.

Terminal-Bench 2.1 BenchmarkTerminal-Bench 2.1 Benchmark

A verified refresh of Terminal-Bench 2.0 — 89 curated tasks across software engineering, system administration, data processing, model training, and security, with environment and instruction fixes so scores reflect agent capability rather than environment gaps.

Terminal-Bench Hard BenchmarkTerminal-Bench Hard Benchmark

An agentic benchmark evaluating AI capabilities in terminal environments through software engineering, system administration, and data processing tasks.

𝜏²-Bench Telecom Benchmark𝜏²-Bench Telecom Benchmark

A dual-control conversational AI benchmark simulating technical support scenarios where both agent and user must coordinate actions to resolve telecom service issues.

MMLU-Pro BenchmarkMMLU-Pro Benchmark

An enhanced version of MMLU with 12,000 graduate-level questions across 14 subject areas, featuring ten answer options and deeper reasoning requirements.

LiveCodeBench BenchmarkLiveCodeBench Benchmark

A contamination-free coding benchmark that continuously harvests fresh competitive programming problems from LeetCode, AtCoder, and CodeForces, evaluating code generation, self-repair, and execution.

MATH-500 BenchmarkMATH-500 Benchmark

A 500-problem subset from the MATH dataset, featuring competition-level mathematics across six domains including algebra, geometry, and number theory.

AIME 2025 BenchmarkAIME 2025 Benchmark

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination, testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999.

Global-MMLU-Lite BenchmarkGlobal-MMLU-Lite Benchmark

A lightweight, multilingual version of MMLU, designed to evaluate knowledge and reasoning skills across a diverse range of languages and cultural contexts.