All Releases

Muse Wonder vs Claude Fable 5.1: Release Comparison

Comparison of the Muse Wonder and Claude Fable 5.1 releases: 2 and 5 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 7 models.

  • For intelligence, Claude Fable 5.1 scores highest: Claude Fable 5.1 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) at 50, against Muse Wonder (Max) at 44 for Muse Wonder.
  • For time per task, Claude Fable 5.1 is fastest: Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) at 7.3 min, against Muse Wonder (High) at 8.8 min for Muse Wonder.
  • For cost per task, Claude Fable 5.1 is cheapest: Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) at $4.47, against Muse Wonder (Max) at $6.95 for Muse Wonder.
Model Playground

Releases compared

Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh)Claude Fable 5.1 (max)Claude Fable 5.1 (high)Muse Wonder (max)Claude Fable 5.1 (medium)Muse Wonder (high)Claude Fable 5.1 (low)
Intelligence Index
50
49
47
44
43
41
39
Finance & Accounting
54
54
50
51
47
50
48
Strategy & Ops
56
58
54
54
52
54
51
Legal
54
54
50
47
48
46
47
Healthcare & Medical
51
51
48
49
45
--
44
Cost per TaskUSD
$10.85
$12.99
$7.54
$6.95
$5.56
--
$4.47
Time per TaskMinutes
18.6
22.2
12.6
12.1
9.4
8.8
7.3
Time to First Answer Tokens
58.20
162.11
15.28
20.56
8.77
10.24
8.10
Context Window
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
Creator
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Meta
Anthropic
Meta
Anthropic
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input Modality

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text, image, speech, and video

Supports: text and image

Supports: text, image, speech, and video

Supports: text and image

Output Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Providers
Anthropic
Anthropic
Anthropic
Meta
Anthropic
Meta
Anthropic
Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1
No publicly available API

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
Claude Fable 5.1
Pareto line

Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Speed & Latency

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Output tokens divided by end-to-end output speed (minutes per Intelligence Index task) · Speed at the model's own endpoint or the median across providers · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Capability Scores

Capability Indexes

Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

vs

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, Muse Wonder (max) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (max)

Chance each model’s answer is judged to show more of each trait from their Elo gap · 50% is an even match
MetaMuse Wonder (max)AnthropicClaude Fable 5.1 (max)
Lexically Varied
9%
91%
Literate
16%
84%
Natural Sounding
19%
81%
Eloquent
20%
80%
Metaphorical
58%
42%