Muse Ember vs GPT-6.1 Sol: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Muse Ember and GPT-6.1 Sol releases: 2 and 5 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 7 models.
- For intelligence, GPT-6.1 Sol scores highest: GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) at 55, against Muse Ember (Max) at 36 for Muse Ember.
- For cost per task, Muse Ember is cheapest: Muse Ember (Xhigh) at $0.12, against GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) at $0.16 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
| GPT-6.1 Sol (max) | GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh) | GPT-6.1 Sol (high) | GPT-6.1 Sol (medium) | Muse Ember (max) | GPT-6.1 Sol (low) | Muse Ember (xhigh) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 55 | 52 | 50 | 46 | 36 | 35 | 34 |
| Finance & Accounting | 56 | 55 | 53 | 51 | 45 | 44 | 44 |
| Strategy & Ops | 58 | 57 | 55 | 53 | 49 | 46 | 49 |
| Legal | 54 | 54 | 52 | 49 | 38 | 43 | 38 |
| Healthcare & Medical | 52 | 51 | 49 | 46 | -- | 40 | -- |
| Cost per TaskUSD | $1.27 | $0.76 | $0.59 | $0.36 | $0.14 | $0.16 | $0.12 |
| Time per TaskMinutes | 20.2 | 9.3 | 6.6 | 3.8 | -- | 1.8 | -- |
| Time to First Answer Tokens | 161.42 | 62.17 | 32.83 | 4.27 | -- | 2.47 | -- |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M |
| Creator | |||||||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Input Modality | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image |
| Output Modality | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text |
| Providers | |||||||
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Capability Scores
Capability Indexes
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better