Muse Ember vs Claude Opus 5.5: Release Comparison
Comparison of the Muse Ember and Claude Opus 5.5 releases: 2 and 5 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 7 models.
- For intelligence, Claude Opus 5.5 scores highest: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) at 59, against Muse Ember (Max) at 36 for Muse Ember.
- For cost per task, Muse Ember is cheapest: Muse Ember (Xhigh) at $0.12, against Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) at $0.98 for Claude Opus 5.5.
| Claude Opus 5.5 (max) | Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh) | Claude Opus 5.5 (high) | Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) | Muse Ember (max) | Claude Opus 5.5 (low) | Muse Ember (xhigh) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 59 | 57 | 52 | 48 | 36 | 35 | 34 |
| Finance & Accounting | 59 | 56 | 53 | 51 | 45 | 42 | 44 |
| Strategy & Ops | 61 | 59 | 58 | 56 | 49 | 48 | 49 |
| Legal | 58 | 55 | 52 | 50 | 38 | 43 | 38 |
| Healthcare & Medical | 58 | 56 | 52 | 51 | -- | 45 | -- |
| Cost per TaskUSD | $10.04 | $6.05 | $3.46 | $2.45 | $0.14 | $0.98 | $0.12 |
| Time per TaskMinutes | 25.1 | 16.3 | 9.5 | 7.1 | -- | 3.0 | -- |
| Time to First Answer Tokens | 382.85 | 84.72 | 28.27 | 13.78 | -- | 5.74 | -- |
| Context Window | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M | 1M |
| Creator | |||||||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Input Modality | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image | Supports: text and image |
| Output Modality | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text | Supports: text |
| Providers | |||||||
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task
Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Time per Intelligence Index Task
Capability Scores
Capability Indexes
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better
Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better