All Releases

GPT-6 Luna vs GLM-5.3: Release Comparison

Comparison of the GPT-6 Luna and GLM-5.3 releases: 6 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 8 models.

  • For intelligence, GLM-5.3 scores highest: GLM-5.3 (Max) at 32, against GPT-6 Luna (Max) at 28 for GPT-6 Luna.
  • For output speed, GPT-6 Luna is fastest: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) at 128 t/s, against GLM-5.3 (Max) at 86 t/s for GLM-5.3.
  • For cost per task, GPT-6 Luna is cheapest: GPT-6 Luna (Low) at $0.01, against GLM-5.3 (Low) at $1.57 for GLM-5.3.
Model Playground

Releases compared

GLM-5.3 (max)GPT-6 Luna (max)GPT-6 Luna (xhigh)GLM-5.3 (low)GPT-6 Luna (high)GPT-6 Luna (medium)GPT-6 Luna (low)GPT-6 Luna (non-reasoning)
Intelligence Index
32
28
23
23
21
18
10
9
Finance & Accounting
42
34
31
31
29
26
17
19
Strategy & Ops
47
43
39
38
38
34
17
17
Legal
36
32
28
28
27
24
16
17
Healthcare & Medical
39
35
30
31
29
27
16
16
Cost per TaskUSD
$5.01
$0.15
$0.10
$1.57
$0.07
$0.04
$0.01
$0.07
Output SpeedTokens/s
86
111
128
82
117
--
115
110
Time to First Tokens
1.55
136.07
34.28
1.68
23.90
--
2.91
0.85
Context Window
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
Creator
Z AI
OpenAI
OpenAI
Z AI
OpenAI
OpenAI
OpenAI
OpenAI
License
Open
Proprietary
Proprietary
Open
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Output Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Providers
OpenAIMicrosoft Azure
OpenAI
OpenAIMicrosoft Azure
OpenAI
OpenAI
OpenAIMicrosoft Azure
Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Output tokens per second · Higher is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
GPT-6 Luna
GLM-5.3
Pareto line

Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

Speed & Latency

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Capability Scores

Capability Indexes

Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

vs

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, GPT-6 Luna (max) vs GLM-5.3 (max)

Chance each model’s answer is judged to show more of each trait from their Elo gap · 50% is an even match
OpenAIGPT-6 Luna (max)Z AIGLM-5.3 (max)
Lexically Varied
1%
99%
Eloquent
1%
99%
Metaphorical
3%
97%
Natural Sounding
10%
90%
Literate
46%
54%