All Releases

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5: Release Comparison

Comparison of the GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5 releases: 5 and 5 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 10 models.

  • For intelligence, Claude Opus 5.5 scores highest: Claude Opus 5.5 (Max, Default Fallback) at 59, against GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) at 55 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
  • For time per task, GPT-6.1 Sol is fastest: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) at 1.8 min, against Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) at 3.1 min for Claude Opus 5.5.
  • For cost per task, GPT-6.1 Sol is cheapest: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) at $0.16, against Claude Opus 5.5 (Low, Default Fallback) at $0.98 for Claude Opus 5.5.
Model Playground

Releases compared

Claude Opus 5.5 (max)Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)GPT-6.1 Sol (max)GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh)Claude Opus 5.5 (high)GPT-6.1 Sol (high)Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)GPT-6.1 Sol (low)Claude Opus 5.5 (low)
Intelligence Index
59
57
55
52
52
50
48
46
35
35
Finance & Accounting
59
56
56
55
53
53
51
51
44
42
Strategy & Ops
61
59
58
57
58
55
56
53
46
48
Legal
58
55
54
54
52
52
50
49
43
43
Healthcare & Medical
58
56
52
51
52
49
51
46
40
45
Cost per TaskUSD
$10.04
$6.05
$1.27
$0.76
$3.46
$0.59
$2.45
$0.36
$0.16
$0.98
Time per TaskMinutes
25.4
16.3
19.9
9.2
9.6
6.5
7.2
3.8
1.8
3.1
Time to First Answer Tokens
415.35
93.90
176.93
70.31
31.89
36.93
14.82
4.36
2.46
6.47
Context Window
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
Creator
Anthropic
Anthropic
OpenAI
OpenAI
Anthropic
OpenAI
Anthropic
OpenAI
OpenAI
Anthropic
License
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Proprietary
Input Modality

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Supports: text and image

Output Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Providers
AnthropicAmazon BedrockGoogleMicrosoft Azure
Anthropic
OpenAIMicrosoft Azure
OpenAI
Anthropic
OpenAI
Anthropic
OpenAI
OpenAI
AnthropicAmazon BedrockGoogleMicrosoft Azure
Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1
No publicly available API

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
GPT-6.1 Sol
Claude Opus 5.5
Pareto line

Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Speed & Latency

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Output tokens divided by end-to-end output speed (minutes per Intelligence Index task) · Speed at the model's own endpoint or the median across providers · Lower is better
No publicly available API

Capability Scores

Capability Indexes

Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

vs

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) vs Claude Opus 5.5 (max)

Chance each model’s answer is judged to show more of each trait from their Elo gap · 50% is an even match
OpenAIGPT-6.1 Sol (max)AnthropicClaude Opus 5.5 (max)
Lexically Varied
2%
98%
Metaphorical
6%
94%
Eloquent
16%
84%
Natural Sounding
39%
61%
Literate
42%
58%