GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Fable 5.1: Release Comparison

Name: Intelligence
Creator: Artificial Analysis
License: https://artificialanalysis.ai/docs/legal/Terms-of-Use.pdf

Comparison of the GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Fable 5.1 releases: 5 and 5 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 10 models.

For intelligence, Claude Fable 5.1 scores highest: Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) at 53, against GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) at 52 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
For output speed, Claude Fable 5.1 is fastest: Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback) at 69 t/s, against GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) at 55 t/s for GPT-6.1 Sol.
For cost per task, GPT-6.1 Sol is cheapest: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) at $0.13, against Claude Fable 5.1 (Low, Default Fallback) at $2.37 for Claude Fable 5.1.

Model Playground

Releases compared


	Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)	Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (max)	Claude Fable 5.1 (high with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh)	GPT-6.1 Sol (high)	Claude Fable 5.1 (medium with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)	Claude Fable 5.1 (low with fallback)	GPT-6.1 Sol (low)
Intelligence Index	53	53	52	51	51	50	49	48	47	42
Finance & Accounting	56	56	54	54	53	53	51	50	49	45
Strategy & Ops	60	58	57	56	56	55	54	53	51	46
Legal	60	61	58	58	57	56	57	54	53	50
Healthcare & Medical	58	--	51	--	--	--	--	--	--	--
Engineering	56	57	54	54	53	52	51	50	49	44
Economics	63	62	59	60	58	58	58	56	55	52
AA-Briefcase v1.1	1672	1655	1557	1580	1504	1465	1528	1361	1482	1117
GDPval-AA v2.1	1754	1732	1594	1635	1538	1511	1545	1450	1469	1315
AutomationBench-AA	59.4%	57.8%	64.9%	55.3%	66.6%	64.5%	54.7%	62.6%	52.2%	52.6%
Terminal-Bench 4.0	52.0%	55.1%	56.1%	52.0%	54.0%	51.5%	44.9%	48.0%	40.4%	30.8%
SciCode	63.1%	60.9%	54.2%	58.7%	55.7%	55.8%	56.4%	53.2%	56.7%	53.2%
Humanity's Last Exam	59.1%	58.7%	52.9%	55.9%	52.6%	51.4%	53.8%	49.9%	48.9%	47.4%
GDP.pdf	26.2%	26.2%	31.0%	26.8%	31.8%	32.0%	26.8%	30.0%	28.0%	27.0%
CritPt	29.7%	31.1%	31.7%	30.3%	31.7%	30.0%	29.1%	27.7%	27.7%	24.9%
AA-Omniscience	43	42	42	41	41	41	38	40	34	38
AA-LCR v1.1	85.3%	83.0%	83.0%	83.7%	79.7%	82.3%	84.7%	83.3%	82.3%	84.0%

Cost per TaskUSD	$7.63	$5.98	$0.72	$3.91	$0.39	$0.32	$2.98	$0.21	$2.37	$0.13
Input PriceUSD/1M Tokens	$10.00	$10.00	$2.00	$10.00	$2.00	$2.00	$10.00	$2.00	$10.00	$2.00
Output PriceUSD/1M Tokens	$50.00	$50.00	$10.00	$50.00	$10.00	$10.00	$50.00	$10.00	$50.00	$10.00
Cache Hit PriceUSD/1M Tokens	$0.25	$0.25	$0.10	$0.25	$0.10	$0.10	$0.25	$0.10	$0.25	$0.10
Cache Write PriceUSD/1M Tokens	$12.50	$12.50	$2.50	$12.50	$2.50	$2.50	$12.50	$2.50	$12.50	$2.50

Output SpeedTokens/s	69	64	55	57	52	48	56	44	57	43
Time to First Tokens	190.98	75.41	239.97	16.97	133.08	40.09	3.19	4.12	2.03	2.80
Time to First Answer Tokens	190.98	75.41	239.97	16.97	133.08	40.09	3.19	4.12	2.03	2.80
End-to-End Response Times	198.25	83.28	249.02	25.77	142.75	50.55	12.15	15.54	10.87	14.42
Time per Tasks	727.85	602.72	687.68	411.11	337.39	266.05	303.39	183.98	239.73	91.58

Context Window	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M	1M
Creator	Anthropic	Anthropic	OpenAI	Anthropic	OpenAI	OpenAI	Anthropic	OpenAI	Anthropic	OpenAI
License	Proprietary	Proprietary	Proprietary	Proprietary	Proprietary	Proprietary	Proprietary	Proprietary	Proprietary	Proprietary
Input Modality	Supports: text and image	Supports: text and image	Supports: text and image	Supports: text and image	Supports: text and image	Supports: text and image	Supports: text and image	Supports: text and image	Supports: text and image	Supports: text and image
Output Modality	Supports: text	Supports: text	Supports: text	Supports: text	Supports: text	Supports: text	Supports: text	Supports: text	Supports: text	Supports: text
Providers

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better

Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Cost per Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 incorporates 10 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.3.2 includes: AA-Briefcase v1.1, GDPval-AA v2.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, SciCode, Humanity's Last Exam, GDP.pdf, CritPt, AA-Omniscience, AA-LCR v1.1. See Intelligence Index methodology for further details, including a breakdown of each evaluation and how we run them.

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task

Most attractive quadrant

GPT-6.1 Sol

Claude Fable 5.1

Pareto line

AA-Briefcase v1.1

GDPval-AA v2.1

Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)

Weighted average cost per Intelligence Index task. Each evaluation’s cost is calculated from input, cache hit, cache write, reasoning, and answer token prices, divided by task count, and weighted by its Intelligence Index weight.

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

Speed & Latency

Output Speed

Output tokens per second · Higher is better

Tokens per second received while the model is generating tokens (ie. after first chunk has been received from the API for models which support streaming).

Figures represent performance of the model's first-party API or the median across providers where a first-party API is not available.

Capability Scores

Capability Indexes

Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries

Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

Model AvsModel B

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)

Chance each model’s answer is judged to show more of each trait from their Elo gap · 50% is an even match

GPT-6.1 Sol (max)

Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)

Lexically Varied

99%

Eloquent

98%

Metaphorical

95%

Natural Sounding

94%

Literate

44%

56%

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Fable 5.1: Release Comparison

Intelligence

Speed

Cost per Task

Intelligence

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Speed & Latency

Output Speed

Output Speed

Model Performance Representation

Capability Scores

Capability Indexes

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, GPT-6.1 Sol (max) vs Claude Fable 5.1 (max with fallback)