All Releases

GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.8 27B: Release Comparison

Comparison of the GLM-5.3 and Qwen3.8 27B releases: 2 and 4 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 6 models.

  • For intelligence, GLM-5.3 scores highest: GLM-5.3 (Max) at 32, against Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) at 20 for Qwen3.8 27B.
  • For time per task, GLM-5.3 is fastest: GLM-5.3 (Low) at 14.1 min, against Qwen3.8 27B (Non-reasoning) at 16.9 min for Qwen3.8 27B.
  • For cost per task, GLM-5.3 is cheapest: GLM-5.3 (Low) at $1.57, against Qwen3.8 27B (Low) at $1.91 for Qwen3.8 27B.
Model Playground

Releases compared

GLM-5.3 (max)GLM-5.3 (low)Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)Qwen3.8 27B (medium)Qwen3.8 27B (low)Qwen3.8 27B (non-reasoning)
Intelligence Index
32
23
20
17
16
10
Finance & Accounting
42
31
36
29
28
22
Strategy & Ops
47
38
39
34
29
16
Legal
36
28
33
26
27
22
Healthcare & Medical
39
31
35
24
23
19
Cost per TaskUSD
$5.01
$1.57
$3.53
$2.16
$1.91
$3.77
Time per TaskMinutes
29.0
14.1
38.1
27.4
25.9
16.9
Time to First Answer Tokens
71.18
7.85
124.50
31.09
16.33
5.51
Context Window
1M
1M
256k
256k
256k
256k
Creator
Z AI
Z AI
Alibaba
Alibaba
Alibaba
Alibaba
License
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Input Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text, image, and video

Supports: text, image, and video

Supports: text, image, and video

Supports: text, image, and video

Output Modality

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Supports: text

Providers
Alibaba Cloud
Alibaba Cloud
Updated
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Higher is better
Inference time (minutes) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better
Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Lower is better

IntelligenceUpdated

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0.1 incorporates 9 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AutomationBench-AA, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf, HLE-Diamond, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), and Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1

Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Task

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index · Weighted average cost (USD) per Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index task
Most attractive quadrant
GLM-5.3
Qwen3.8 27B
Pareto line

Cost per Task (USD, Log Scale)

Cost

Cost per Intelligence Index Task

Weighted average cost (USD) per Intelligence Index task · Segmented by token type · Lower is better

Speed & Latency

Time per Intelligence Index Task

Output tokens divided by end-to-end output speed (minutes per Intelligence Index task) · Speed at the model's own endpoint or the median across providers · Lower is better

Capability Scores

Capability Indexes

Measures the performance of models on specific capabilities and industries
Finance & Accounting Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, AutomationBench-AA, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Strategy & Ops Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AutomationBench-AA, AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

Legal Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better

Healthcare & Medical Index

Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, AA-Briefcase v1.1, MLCR-AA, AutomationBench-AA, HLE-Diamond · Higher is better

Engineering Index

Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience v1.1, CritPt v2 (Hard Subset), Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode 2.0, AA-Briefcase v1.1 · Higher is better

Economics Index

Incorporates 4 evaluations: AA-Briefcase v1.1, AA-Omniscience v1.1, HLE-Diamond, GDP.pdf · Higher is better

AA-PersonalityBenchNew

vs

AA-PersonalityBench: Expressiveness Index, GLM-5.3 (max) vs Qwen3.8 27B (xhigh)

Chance each model’s answer is judged to show more of each trait from their Elo gap · 50% is an even match
Z AIGLM-5.3 (max)AlibabaQwen3.8 27B (xhigh)
Lexically Varied
100%
0%
Natural Sounding
99%
1%
Eloquent
98%
2%
Metaphorical
88%
12%
Literate
87%
13%