GLM-5.2 vs Qwen3.5 9B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the GLM-5.2 and Qwen3.5 9B releases: 2 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 4 models.
- For intelligence, GLM-5.2 scores highest: GLM-5.2 (max) at 34, against Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) at 14 for Qwen3.5 9B.
- For output speed, GLM-5.2 is fastest: GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) at 120 t/s, against Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) at 96 t/s for Qwen3.5 9B.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indices
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Terminal-Bench v4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-5.2 (max) |  Z AI | 34 | 753B 40B active at inference time | 1M | $0.9 | 68 |    +16 | ||
| GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) | Z AI | 22 | 753B 40B active at inference time | 1M | $0.9 | 120 |   +4 | ||
| Qwen3.5 9B (Reasoning) |  Alibaba | 14 | 9.7B | 262k | $0.1 | 91 |   | ||
| Qwen3.5 9B (Non-reasoning) | Alibaba | 13 | 9.7B | 262k | $0.2 | 96 | |