GLM-5.2 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: Release Comparison
Comparison of the GLM-5.2 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B releases: 2 and 2 models respectively, each with different intelligence, performance, and pricing characteristics. Below is a comparison of the key metrics across all 4 models.
- For intelligence, GLM-5.2 scores highest: GLM-5.2 (max) at 34, against NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) at 9 for NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
- For output speed, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is fastest: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) at 169 t/s, against GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) at 149 t/s for GLM-5.2.
- For cost per task, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheapest: NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) at $0.02, against GLM-5.2 (max) at $0.96 for GLM-5.2.
Releases compared
Intelligence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
Intelligence Index vs. Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Cost
Cost per Intelligence Index Task
Speed & Latency
Output Speed
Capability Scores
Capability Indices
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AutomationBench-AA, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf · Higher is better
Incorporates 7 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Humanity's Last Exam, AA-LCR v1.1, GDP.pdf, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, MLCR-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, AutomationBench-AA · Higher is better
Incorporates 6 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, CritPt, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Higher is better
Incorporates 5 evaluations: AA-Omniscience, Humanity's Last Exam, GDPval-AA v2, AA-Briefcase, AA-LCR v1.1 · Higher is better
Further details
Input modality | Output modality | Weights | Provider Benchmarks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-5.2 (max) |  Z AI | 34 | 34 | 31 | 35 | 33 | 37 | 46 | $0.96 | $0.9 | $1.40 | $4.40 | $0.26 | $1,559 | 64k | 51k | 178M | 72 | 8.15s | 35.80s | 42.71s | 839.88s | 753B 40B active at inference time | 1M | Jun 2026 | - | Yes | Supports: text | Supports: text |    +16 | |||
| GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning) | Z AI | 22 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.9 | $1.40 | $4.40 | $0.26 | - | - | - | - | 149 | 1.76s | 1.76s | 5.13s | - | 753B 40B active at inference time | 1M | Jun 2026 | - | No | Supports: text | Supports: text |   +4 | |||
| NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) |  NVIDIA | 9 | 9 | 6 | 10 | - | 13 | 15 | $0.02 | $0.1 | $0.05 | $0.20 | - | $64 | 27k | 24k | 178M | 169 | 1.29s | 13.10s | 16.05s | 148.19s | 31.6B 3.6B active at inference time | 1M | Dec 2025 | - | Yes | Supports: text | Supports: text |  | |||
| NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Non-reasoning) | NVIDIA | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | $0.1 | $0.05 | $0.20 | - | - | - | - | - | 166 | 0.97s | 0.97s | 3.99s | - | 31.6B 3.6B active at inference time | 1M | Dec 2025 | - | No | Supports: text | Supports: text | | |||